Search

How safe is Starmer’s premiership after his Mandelson vetting statement to MPs?

House of Commons. That seemed too painful an admission for Starmer to make, when he had so expertly prosecuted Boris Johnson for misleading

What Starmer said, and didn’t say, in the Commons about the Mandelson saga

Starmer believes he did not mislead MPs > double quotation markNo I did not mislead the House of Commons

Three key statements Starmer made to MPs about Mandelson vetting

Starmer should be investigated in Parliament for allegedly misleading the House of Commons. It relates

Partygate v Mandelson: Keir Starmer faces attack from his own playbook

Starmer misled the Commons when he repeatedly told MPs “full due process” had been followed. In the UK, misleading the house

Former Labour MP calls for Starmer to face Commons committee over Mandelson vetting

misleading the [House of Commons](https://www.theguardian.com/politics/houseofcommons). However, there are evident inconsistencies between statements made during PMQs, and the evidence given by Oliver Robbins.” During PMQs, Starmer

Badenoch accuses PM of misleading MPs over Mandelson vetting

misleading the House of Commons, after a report suggested Lord Mandelson failed his security vetting for the role of US ambassador. [The Guardian newspaper reported](https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2026/apr/16/revealed-mandelson-failed-vetting-but-foreign-office-overruled-decision) that the Foreign Office overruled the vetting

Senior Labour figures say call for new Mandelson investigation is a ‘political stunt’

misleading the House of Commons,” they said. Emily Thornberry, the Labour MP who chairs the foreign affairs committee, said she could not see the need for a second inquiry while the one she is leading

Officials deliberately withheld Mandelson vetting result from me, Starmer says

Starmer has accused officials in the Foreign Office of deliberately and repeatedly withholding the fact Lord Mandelson initially failed security vetting for the role of US ambassador. Giving a statement to MPs, the prime minister

Labour figures criticise calls for inquiry into PM's Mandelson claims

House of Commons, so a large number of Labour MPs would have to vote for an inquiry or abstain in order for one to be launched. The Privileges Committee can look into cases

PM won't face inquiry over claims he misled MPs on Mandelson vetting

Starmer will not face a parliamentary investigation over claims he misled MPs about the process to appoint Lord Mandelson as US ambassador. The House of Commons voted 335 to 223 against a Conservative-led motion

Five unanswered questions on Keir Starmer’s Mandelson debacle

mislead parliament, even unintentionally? The prime minister told MPs that “full due process” had been followed in appointing Mandelson. Asked if parliament had been misled, even if this was not the PM’s fault

Key points from Starmer's Mandelson statement

Starmer has been in the Commons again defending his actions over the appointment of Lord Mandelson as ambassador to the US. It comes after it emerged the peer was given security clearance for the role

Keir Starmer vows to lead Labour into next general election after bruising week

house, or had done any wrongdoing here that’s all been shown not to be the case.” It has been a bruising week for the prime minister after [the Guardian revealed](https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2026/apr/16/revealed-mandelson-failed-vetting-but-foreign-office-overruled-decision) that

Keir Starmer to face vote on Mandelson vetting scandal as key figures give evidence to MPs - UK politics live

misleading MPs [is flimsy](https://www.theguardian.com/politics/live/2026/apr/27/keir-starmer-peter-mandelson-inquiry-speaker-shoplifting-latest-news-updates?page=with%3Ablock-69ef43ed8f08cdba1e3f9b68#block-69ef43ed8f08cdba1e3f9b68), and the comparison to Johnson is wide of the mark. Labour is saying the vote today is just a stunt ahead of next week’s local elections