Search

Starmer faces Commons showdown over Mandelson vetting scandal

UK security vetting recommendations, while rightly protecting detailed sensitive vetting information, to allow ministers to make judgements on appointments or on explaining matters to parliament.” At the same time, Starmer told the [Daily Mirror

Olly Robbins’ account of Mandelson vetting piles pressure on Starmer

UK’s most sensitive diplomatic post, and warned that his leadership is now on borrowed time. The Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC), which this week is going through hundreds more files relating to Mandelson

No, Minister: the week Keir Starmer had his own Sir Humphrey moment

Mandelson took up the job, given that vetting result? “I was told – let me be completely precise – that UKSV [UK Security Vetting] were leaning towards recommending

Officials deliberately withheld Mandelson vetting result from me, Starmer says

UK Security Vetting, a specialist agency within the Cabinet Office, began the vetting process in late December 2024, and on 28 January 2025, recommended Developed Vetting clearance should be denied. But Foreign Office officials went

Key takeaways from senior official on Mandelson vetting

UK or US governments. Repeatedly pressed over whether Lord Mandelson's security vetting file could have included material which was not in the due diligence report, Little said she could not comment specifically on what

What is Developed Vetting security clearance at centre of Mandelson row?

security clearance by the Foreign Office against the recommendation of the government's vetting agency when he was made US ambassador. The government is under intense pressure to explain how Mandelson came to be granted

Cabinet secretary apparently advised Starmer to wait for vetting before appointing Mandelson

UK security vetting recommendations, while rightly protecting detailed sensitive vetting information, to allow ministers to make judgments on appointments or on explaining matters to parliament.” Asked whether it had been a mistake to not follow

Five questions left unanswered by the Mandelson files

UK's diplomatic relations, so we don't know what those messages say. The government has said Lord Mandelson was granted security clearance for the role by the Foreign Office, against the recommendation of United

No 10 had 'dismissive attitude' to Mandelson vetting, says sacked Foreign Office chief

UK Security Vetting (UKSV), the government agency that did Lord Mandelson's vetting, did not relate to his previous relationship with Epstein, but did not say what they were about. Sir Olly insisted that

Revealed: Mandelson vetting warned of ties to senior figures in China, Russia and Israel

UK’s ambassador to the US, the sources said. They added that United Kingdom Security Vetting (UKSV) also noted Mandelson had a very close relationship with a fourth individual, who is British, that could

How Olly Robbins’ knightly charm glossed over burning questions on Mandelson vetting

Mandelson’s vetting file, which was completed by UK Security Vetting (UKSV) on 28 January 2025, weeks before he was due to take up his post. Thanks to the Cabinet Office’s decision to publish

Peter Mandelson scandal: the key questions that remain unanswered

UK Security Vetting (UKSV), an agency within the Cabinet Office, but the final decision rested with the Foreign Office. After twice interviewing Mandelson and scrutinising his background, officials in UKSV completed their assessment

Key points from Starmer's Mandelson statement

UK's then former top civil servant investigated Lord Mandelson's sacking last year. The repeated failure to divulge the result of Lord Mandelson's vetting process was "incredible", "staggering" and "astonishing", the prime minister

UK PM Starmer admits Mandelson mistake, rejects resignation calls

UK Parliament on Monday that, while the appointment was a mistake, he would have withdrawn the decision had he known the Foreign Office had overruled security officials’ recommendations not to give the job to Mandelson

What Starmer said, and didn’t say, in the Commons about the Mandelson saga

Security Vetting] recommended to the Foreign Office that developed vetting clearance should be denied to Peter Mandelson. The following day … Foreign Office officials made the decision to grant developed vetting clearance.” This is a small

Partygate v Mandelson: Keir Starmer faces attack from his own playbook

vetting officials recommending that he be denied security clearance. That disclosure came about only because of a process started by Kemi Badenoch, the Conservative leader. Earlier this year, she secured a [“humble address”](https://www.theguardian.com

Top Cabinet Office official to give evidence to MPs about Peter Mandelson’s vetting – UK politics live

UK Security Vetting (UKSV) document that revealed that the UKSV officials who interviewed Mandelson for his developed vetting (DV) advised that he should not get clearance. At a meeting on Tuesday last week she reported

'Staggering' I was not told Mandelson failed vetting, says PM

security vetting checks. The prime minister is facing calls to resign over the revelation that vetting officers recommended against Lord Mandelson's being appointed as US ambassador, but that recommendation was overruled by the Foreign

I made 'serious mistake' advising Starmer to appoint Mandelson, PM's ex-top adviser says

recommending the appointment of Lord Mandelson as the UK's ambassador to the US. Morgan McSweeney, who resigned in February over the advice, said he felt the peer's experience as an EU trade envoy

Sacked Foreign Office chief Olly Robbins to face MPs’ questions over Mandelson vetting – UK politics live

recommendation from officials and grant vetting approval. The most interesting question is, why? And here it will get difficult for Starmer, because Robbins is likely to argue that he felt under pressure to grant vetting