Olly Robbins, former Foreign Office chief, will testify before MPs regarding Peter Mandelson's vetting as US ambassador. Robbins was dismissed for not informing Keir Starmer about Mandelson's failed security vetting.
Key points
Olly Robbins will testify before the Commons foreign affairs committee
Robbins was sacked for not informing Starmer about Mandelson's vetting
Mandelson failed his security vetting interview
Trump criticized Starmer's appointment of Mandelson
Robbins' testimony could impact Starmer's political future
Donald Trump seems to be conducting his relationship with Keir Starmer chiefly by online trolling at the moment. He was at it again overnight, with a post on his Truth Social network saying that, when Starmer appointed Peter Mandelson as ambassador to the US, it was a “really bad pick”.
Trump post
Trump post Photograph: Truth Social
Good morning. At 9am Olly Robbins will give evidence to the Commons foreign affairs committee about the appointment of Peter Mandelson as ambassador to the US. Until last week Robbins was permanent secretary at the Foreign Office and his predecessor but one in that office, Simon McDonald, was the man who terminated Boris Johnson’s career with a revelation showing that Johnson had lied about his knowledge of a sleaze allegation about a minister. Robbins is not expected to produce a bombshell on that scale, but his evidence will be moment of jeodpardy for Keir Starmer nevertheless.
Robbins was sacked because he had not told Starmer that Mandelson failed his security vetting interview after Starmer had announced he was getting the ambassador’s job. If Robbins were to prove that Starmer were told, that would be career ending for the PM. But no one is expecting that.
Instead, the hearing will illustrate the dispute between the PM and the former head of the Foreign Office over whether Robbins should have told Downing Street. Starmer says he should; Robbins is expected to say that that he was meant to keep the process confidential because all that ultimately mattered was the final decision – which is that Mandelson did get vetting approval, because Robbins used his judgment as the decision-maker to ignore the recommendation from officials and grant vetting approval.
The most interesting question is, why? And here it will get difficult for Starmer, because Robbins is likely to argue that he felt under pressure to grant vetting approval because Starmer had already said he wanted Mandelson to get the job, despite knowing full well about the multiple factors that made his appointment problematic.
Why was Olly Robbins sacked from the Foreign Office?
Olly Robbins was sacked for failing to inform Keir Starmer that Peter Mandelson had failed his security vetting interview before Starmer announced Mandelson's appointment as US ambassador.
What will Olly Robbins discuss in his testimony to MPs?
Robbins will provide evidence about the circumstances surrounding Peter Mandelson's appointment as ambassador to the US and the security vetting process.
What could happen if Robbins proves Starmer was informed about Mandelson's vetting?
If Robbins can prove that Starmer was aware of Mandelson's failed vetting, it could end Starmer's political career.
How does Donald Trump view Keir Starmer's appointment of Mandelson?
Donald Trump criticized Keir Starmer's appointment of Peter Mandelson as US ambassador, calling it a 'really bad pick' on his Truth Social platform.
See every story in News — including breaking news and analysis.
double quotation markBack before Lord Mandelson was announced as the appointee, there was a process … within the Cabinet Office to make sure that the prime minister was aware of Lord Mandelson and the issues around his appointment. There was then a process of clearing his conflicts of interest, which the employing department [the Foreign Office] oversaw, which we have talked about. In parallel with that process, we also went through the standard UK national security vetting process for DV [developed vetting].
Mandleson failed the DV interview. But Robbins was making the point that, by then, Mandelson had already been approved by the Cabinet Office’s due diligence process (a separate vetting exercise). Robbins also told the committee:
double quotation markBy the time we are describing [when DV was carried out], it was clear that the prime minister wanted to make this appointment himself.
In the Times, Steven Swinford and Oliver Wright highlight this in their story on today’s hearing, saying Stamer “will be accused of pressuring the Foreign Office into approving the appointment of Lord Mandelson despite being aware of his friendship with the paedophile Jeffrey Epstein and his business links to Russia and China”.
And here is the our analysis, by Kiran Stacey, Henry Dyer and Paul Lewis, of all the issues likely to come up at the hearing.
Here is the agenda for the day.
9am: Olly Robbins, the former permanent secretary at the Foreign Office, gives evidence to the Commons foreign affairs committee.
9.30am:Keir Starmer chairs cabinet, including a political cabinet session.
9.30am: The Good Growth Foundation holds a day-long National Growth Debate, with speeches from Ed Miliband, the energy secretary, Rachel Reeves, the chancellor, and Darren Jones, the chief secretary to the PM.
10am: Executives from TikTok, Meta, Roblox, and academics give evidence to the Commons education committee on screen time and social media.
11.30am: Yvette Cooper, the foreign secretary, takes questions in the Commons.
Noon: Downing Street holds a lobby briefing.
After 12.30pm: Rachel Reeves, the chancellor, makes a statement to MPs.
After 1.30pm: MPs begin an emergency debate tabed by the Tories on the appointment of Peter Mandelson as ambassador to the US.
2.20pm: John Swinney, the Scottish first minister, speaks at the STUC conference.
If you want to contact me, please post a message below the line when comments are open (between 10am and 3pm), or message me on social media. I can’t read all the messages BTL, but if you put “Andrew” in a message aimed at me, I am more likely to see it because I search for posts containing that word.
If you want to flag something up urgently, it is best to use social media. You can reach me on Bluesky at @andrewsparrowgdn.bsky.social. The Guardian has given up posting from its official accounts on X, but individual Guardian journalists are there, I still have my account, and if you message me there at @AndrewSparrow, I will see it and respond if necessary.
I find it very helpful when readers point out mistakes, even minor typos. No error is too small to correct. And I find your questions very interesting too. I can’t promise to reply to them all, but I will try to reply to as many as I can, either BTL or sometimes in the blog.
