Sweden's government is shifting back to physical books and paper in schools to combat declining literacy rates. This move has faced criticism from tech advocates who warn it may harm students' future job prospects.
Key points
Sweden's government promotes physical books in schools
Aim to reverse declining literacy levels
Criticism from tech companies and educators
Concerns about future job prospects for students
Shift contrasts with Sweden's tech-savvy reputation
Sweden's government is championing a renewed focus on physical books, paper and pens in classrooms, designed to reverse falling literacy levels.
But doubling down on analogue tools has drawn criticism from tech companies, educators and computer scientists, who argue it could impact pupils' employment prospects, and even damage the Nordic nation's economy.
At a high school in Nacka just outside Stockholm, final-year students are unpacking laptops from rucksacks and tote bags, alongside items they say they used less frequently a few years ago.
"I now go home from school with new books and papers often," says Sophie, 18. She says one teacher "has started printing all the texts that we use during the lesson", while a digital learning platform in maths lessons has been swapped out for textbook-only teaching.
It's an image that clashes with Sweden's reputation as one of Europe's most tech savvy societies, thanks to high levels of digital skills, and a thriving tech start-up scene.
Laptops became mainstream in Swedish classrooms in the late 2000s and early 2010s. By 2015, around 80% of pupils at municipal state-funded high schools had individual access to a digital device, according to official data.
The compulsory use of tablets in pre-schools was included in the curriculum in 2019, as part of the previous Social Democrat-led government's mission to prepare even the youngest children for an increasingly digital work and private life.
But the current right-wing coalition, which came to power in 2022, is moving teaching in a different direction.
"We're trying, actually, to get rid of screens as much as possible," says Joar Forsell, an education spokesperson for the Liberal party whose leader is Sweden's education minister.
"With higher ages in school you might use them a little bit more, but with lower ages, or in school, I don't think we should use screens at all."
The government has frequently used the slogan "från skärm till pärm", which sounds catchy in Swedish, and translates to "from screen to binder".
It argues that screen-free lessons create better conditions for children to concentrate and develop their writing and reading skills.
Since 2025, pre-schools are no longer required to use digital tools, and tablets aren't given to children under the age of two.
Later this year a ban on mobiles in schools – even for educational use – comes into force.
Q&A
Why is Sweden's government promoting physical books in schools?
The government aims to reverse falling literacy levels among students by focusing on traditional learning methods.
What are the concerns regarding Sweden's shift away from digital learning?
Critics, including tech companies and educators, argue that this shift could negatively impact students' employment prospects and the economy.
How are students in Sweden reacting to the return of physical books?
Students, like 18-year-old Sophie, report using physical books and papers more frequently, indicating a significant change in their learning environment.
What does this change mean for Sweden's reputation in technology?
The move away from digital tools contrasts with Sweden's image as a tech-savvy nation, known for its high digital skills and vibrant tech start-up scene.
Blair’s advice for Labour fails to engage with inequality, senior party figures say
Senior Labour party figures criticize Tony Blair's recent advice, stating it overlooks issues of inequality and austerity. Andy Burnham plans to respond, emphasizing that understanding inequality is crucial for addressing Britain's political challenges.
See every story in News — including breaking news and analysis.
Schools have already been allocated more than 2.1bn krona ($200m; £157m) in grants to invest in textbooks and teacher guides. A new curriculum designed to enforce textbook-based learning is due in 2028.
"Reading real books and writing on real paper, and counting with real numbers on real paper, is much better if you want kids to get the knowledge they need," argues Forsell.
The shift in approach followed a consultation in 2023 involving academic researchers, teaching organisations, public agencies and municipalities.
"There's been an increased awareness of the disruption that technology is causing in classrooms," says Dr Sissela Nutley, a neuroscientist affiliated with the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm, who is amongst those who have raised concerns about the use of digital tools.
Nuttley says that pupils can lose concentration through seeing what other children are doing on screens. She also points to a growing body of international research which suggests reading texts on digital devices can make it harder for children to process information, and that heavy screen use can even impact younger pupil's brain development.
The government hopes the shift back to more traditional teaching methods will help improve Sweden's standing in the Pisa rankings - the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development's (OECD's) benchmark for core educational subjects. Once a star performer, Sweden's scores plummeted in 2012, and after a brief recovery, saw another significant dip in maths and reading in 2022.
Although still slightly above the average for OECD nations, the country performed worse in literacy in 2022 than countries including the UK, US, Denmark and Finland. Almost a quarter (24%) of students aged 15 or 16 did not reach a basic level of reading comprehension.
"We know that the kids that have been going through the whole school system with a lot of screens – that they're lagging behind in international surveys," says Forsell.
A report into education in Sweden, released by the OECD in January of this year, concluded that, on balance, Swedish pupils benefit from access to digital tools.
However, it highlighted a high prevalence of digital distractions in Swedish classrooms, and found that a heavy use of digital devices in maths lessons correlated with lower results. Although scores were, notably, still higher than amongst those who used no digital devices at all.
Andreas Schleicher, director for education at the OECD, urges caution around attributing "cause and effect", yet suggests that Sweden's previous more "extreme" adoption of technology compared to other countries is likely to have impacted its results.
"It just put a lot of devices and technology into classrooms without clear pedagogical intent, without clear goalposts," he argues.
But in Sweden, the government's back-to-books strategy has sparked fierce debates in the business community.
A new report from trade association Swedish Edtech Industry warns that a more analogue education risk pupils being underprepared for future jobs.
"Everybody needs digital basic skills in order to enter the workforce," argues Jannie Jeppesen, the association's CEO and a former teacher. She cites a recent EU report which estimates that 90% of jobs will soon require digital skills.
Jeppesen is also worried about the impact on entrepreneurship and innovation. Sweden is currently Europe's leading factory for tech "unicorns" (companies valued at $1bn [£740m] or more), in relation to the size of its population.
These include music streamer Spotify and Legora, an AI platform for the legal profession. These types of companies "will move elsewhere" if they can't find the right IT competences in Sweden, argues Jeppeson.
There is also the issue of the growing global use of artificial intelligence (AI). The Swedish government wants secondary schools to start giving lessons on the opportunities and risks of using AI, but some critics say that AI should also be part of the curriculum for younger children too.
Without such measures, younger children from richer families, whose parents are more likely to be able to help them understand how to use AI tools, will gain an advantage creating a "digital divide", warns Prof Linnéa Stenliden, at Linköping University's Department of Behavioral Sciences.
But back at Sweden's parliament, Forsell insists children should not be taught about AI before they've mastered other basic skills, and rejects the idea that the government's more traditional approach to education will broaden inequality.
"You can only give people the opportunities that inequality is taking away from them, by giving them proper education," he says.
However, Jeppesen, the Swedish EdTech industry CEO, argues this is a "populistic" stance. She says the government's focus on digital versus analogue classrooms steers the focus away from other factors potentially impacting results.
This includes the unequal distribution of educational resources and teaching capabilities, highlighted by a March report from Sweden's Education Agency.
In Nacka, the views of final year pupils are also divided.
"The internet has kind of taken over the younger generations, and I've noticed them kind of lose focus easier," says Alexis, 18, who doesn't want his younger siblings to use digital tools in school as much as his generation did.
But others, like 19-year-old Jasmine, are in favour of a digital education, even for primary school aged children. "Let's focus more on computers. Because if we are being realistic, the whole world is using computers."
