8 resultsfor “requirements for releasing Epstein documents”
release investigative documents related to billionaire financier [Jeffrey Epstein](/news/2026/4/13/us-judge-dismisses-trumps-10bn-lawsuit-against-wsj-over-epstein-story). The White House initially resisted the calls, but Trump eventually signed legislation passed by both the House and the Senate that required
documents purportedly withheld under lawful exemptions should actually be disclosed. Spencer Kuvin of Goldlaw, who has represented numerous Epstein victims, addressed Bondi’s absence and Blanche’s recent statements. “These developments only underscore how fragile
requires the justice department to release all files related to Epstein and his jailed co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell within 30 days. The agency, which has released files in intermittent batches since then, has said
requirements enumerated in the Act” and the its “processes for addressing post-release publication concerns”. “If circumstances warrant, the OIG will consider addressing other issues that may arise during the course of the audit
Epstein was laid bare in the first tranche of files released in the US. On 10 September Starmer said in parliament he had “confidence in him”, and on 11 September a Downing Street spokesperson told
releasing documents related to Lord Mandelson's appointment. MPs demanded the publication of the documents earlier this year through a parliamentary procedure known as a humble address. It was through this process that she asked
Epstein while serving in Gordon Brown’s government, prompting fresh parliamentary scrutiny of Starmer’s decision to appoint him.  Starmer (right) and Mandelson during a welcome reception
release “all papers relating to Mandelson’s appointment”. The revelation that the now former ambassador was not granted clearance by UK Security Vetting (UKSV), a division of the Cabinet Office that scrutinises the background