Search

Officials debate withholding Mandelson vetting documents from parliament

Mandelson’s security vetting, to the parliamentary intelligence and security committee (ISC). The committee has been

Pressure on Starmer amid Mandelson revelations as Foreign Office official forced out – UK politics live

Mandelson’s security vetting, to the parliamentary intelligence and security committee (ISC). - The Guardian understands

Mandelson papers being withheld, says intelligence watchdog

Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) has said. Lord Beamish, chair of the committee tasked with reviewing the documents, said Lord Mandelson

Olly Robbins’ account of Mandelson vetting piles pressure on Starmer

Mandelson’s reputation to the UK’s most sensitive diplomatic post, and warned that his leadership is now on borrowed time. The Intelligence and Security Committee

Ministers have no authority to withhold Mandelson vetting file, committee says

Mandelson’s appointment as US ambassador has revealed that the government is withholding his vetting file despite not having the authority to do so. In an extraordinary intervention, the intelligence and security committee

Ministers urged to share Mandelson vetting files with intelligence committee

Mandelson’s appointment as ambassador to the US. The motion made an exemption for documents “prejudicial to UK national security or international relations”, which would be given to the Intelligence and Security Committee

In Peter Mandelson evidence, Cat Little had the best weapon: an audit trail

Mandelson’s UKSV file, were to be handed to parliament’s intelligence and security committee

Revealed: Mandelson failed vetting but Foreign Office overruled decision

intelligence and security committee could amount to a breach of a parliamentary motion to release “all papers relating to Mandelson

Five questions awaiting Starmer as he faces Commons over Mandelson scandal

Mandelson for potential criminal activity. The documents also need to be inspected by the Intelligence and Security Committee

Morgan McSweeney, Starmer’s former chief of staff, to be questioned by MPs

intelligence and security committee on Tuesday. The ISC is understood to be furious at the lack of key documents relating to Robbins’ decision to overturn the recommendation to deny Mandelson

Monday briefing: How is it possible the prime minister didn’t know about Mandelson’s vetting failure?

Mandelson’s appointment. While sensitive material can be withheld from publication, it must still be shared with the intelligence and security committee

Starmer was kept in dark about Mandelson’s vetting by two top civil servants

Mandelson’s appointment. The motion made an exception for papers prejudicial to national security or international relations, which it said should be released to the intelligence and security committee

Starmer accuses Robbins of obstructing truth about Mandelson vetting

Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC), who are expected to assess it before returning it to the government within days for public release. The Guardian understands this includes a short summary document including details of Mandelson

Robbins says officials considered withholding Mandelson vetting files from parliament

intelligence and security committee (ISC), which has been asked to review the vetting process, said he took “a dim view” of any attempt to stop full disclosure of all the relevant papers. He said: “Parliament

Digested week: King bites his tongue as a president indulges his fantasies | John Crace

committee was Olly Robbins – a Sir, obviously – who had been permanent secretary at the Foreign Office up until a week previously when Keir had sacked him for failing to mention that UK Security Vetting

Chris Mason: PM facing awkward hours ahead as Mandelson questions remain

Committee will be as fascinating as his testimony. It will also be worth cross-checking what we hear from the prime minister on Monday afternoon with what has already been published about the appointment

Starmer to face MPs for first time since Olly Robbins’ Mandelson evidence – UK politics live

security vetting having been completed and claims that he would have changed his mind had he been told that the vetting process had raised the concerns about Mandelson’s previous conduct of which

Olly Robbins and Mandelson’s vetting: what did he do, why – and who knew?

committee, sent a letter to the new foreign secretary, Yvette Cooper. Thornberry asked what security concerns were raised during the vetting process and what the response of the FCDO had been. Were any conditions imposed

No, Minister: the week Keir Starmer had his own Sir Humphrey moment

committee, as many a civil servant embroiled in a crisis has in the past. How was it that Mandelson took up the job, given that vetting result? “I was told – let me be completely precise