Search

What is Developed Vetting security clearance at centre of Mandelson row?

security clearances being reviewed We do not know if any of the above applied to Mandelson, nor do we know what issues

Cabinet secretary apparently advised Starmer to wait for vetting before appointing Mandelson

security clearances and do due diligence on any potential conflicts of interest or other issues of which you should be aware before confirming your choice”. The letter, sent on 11 November 2024, said the decision

Olly Robbins and Mandelson’s vetting: what did he do, why – and who knew?

issues between Mandelson’s new role and the consultancy he had founded, Global Counsel. When that was established, Robbins had taken the advice of the security services and made his decision to grant clearance

Three key statements Starmer made to MPs about Mandelson vetting

security clearances and do due diligence on any potential Conflicts of Interest or other issues of which you should be aware before confirming your choice." Case's successor as cabinet secretary Sir Chris Wormald [said

No 10 had 'dismissive attitude' to Mandelson vetting, says sacked Foreign Office chief

clearance not be granted - Telling the prime minister about any details of the vetting, other than the outcome of the process, would have been against the rules - Dropping Lord Mandelson as the nominee

PM won't face inquiry over claims he misled MPs on Mandelson vetting

security clearance for the role by the Foreign Office despite concerns being raised by vetting officials. The Commons debate on Tuesday came after the Foreign Affairs Committee heard further evidence about the vetting process, including

PM's ex-chief of staff says he doesn't recognise claims about his behaviour

issue in detail ahead of [giving evidence to MPs on the Foreign Affairs Committee next week](https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c5yjl1pmv55o). McSweeney is likely to be asked by the committee about whether he put pressure on civil

Officials deliberately withheld Mandelson vetting result from me, Starmer says

issue. Lord Mandelson was announced as the UK's ambassador to the US in December 2024, before in-depth vetting had been carried out. He formally took up the role on 10 February

UK PM Starmer admits Mandelson mistake, rejects resignation calls

issue has developed into a major scandal. The premier denied misleading parliament and placed the blame squarely on the shoulders of the Foreign Office, saying that it beggared belief that officials “saw fit to withhold

Olly Robbins says he faced ‘constant pressure’ to get Mandelson in post

clearance with those mitigations. Pressed by Emily Thornberry, the committee chair, about why he had not requested the vetting document, Robbins said he always took oral briefings to ensure confidentiality. Robbins said in his letter

Starmer insists 'majority' of Labour MPs back his leadership

Mandelson's vetting process. "When I'm told there's security clearance, should I go back and quiz officials and say, 'Are you telling me the truth?'" "If I questioned every bit of information

Morgan McSweeney, Starmer’s former chief of staff, to be questioned by MPs

clearance for Mandelson and had taken a “dismissive” attitude to vetting. Emily Thornberry, the committee chair, asked whether it had been McSweeney, to which Robbins said it was mainly the prime minister’s private office

Key evidence from sacked official at heart of Mandelson vetting row

Security Vetting (UKSV), the government's in-house vetting unit, containing their vetting assessment of Lord Mandelson. He said that instead, he was given an oral briefing, during which he was told the vetting agency

Ministers urged to share Mandelson vetting files with intelligence committee

clearance but that advice was overruled by the Foreign Office so he could take up his post. At the heart of the controversy are two documents. The first was produced by UKSV setting

Key takeaways from senior official on Mandelson vetting

clearance. Little suggested it was unusual there was no formal record of the meeting when the prime minister decided to go ahead with Lord Mandelson's appointment. "It is normal to keep a record

No way to raise Mandelson concerns, former senior official says

issue" because of the Labour peer's known links to the late convicted sex offender, Jeffrey Epstein. But he said he was "presented with a decision" made by Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and "told

Who is ‘cravat man’? Neckwear steals the show in Olly Robbins parliamentary grilling

Mandelson security vetting clearance, was commended by many commentators for being sharp, calm and convincing.  Behind Alastair Campbell, caught on C-Span. Photograph: Screengrab What did Edwards

Monday briefing: How is it possible the prime minister didn’t know about Mandelson’s vetting failure?

clearance in late January 2025, but Starmer had by then announced he would be making Mandelson the UK’s chief diplomat in Washington, potentially posing a dilemma for officials at the Foreign Office. Paul points

Robbins's revelations are a dangerous moment for Starmer

Security Vetting (UKSV), then he wouldn't have pressed ahead with the appointment. That's because Sir Olly's implicit claim - contested vigorously now by No 10 - is that the political team in Downing Street

Foreign secretary concerned ministers not told of Mandelson vetting fears sooner

issues raised in the vetting process to appoint Lord Mandelson as US ambassador. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer is facing calls to resign from opposition parties and is due to answer questions on the scandal