10 resultsfor “Mamata Banerjee accusations by BJP”
Mamata Banerjee, said there had been widespread irregularities in the vote and accused the BJP
Mamata Banerjee, as chief minister since 2011. Banerjee, leader of the regional All India Trinamool Congress (TMC) party, also [lost her seat](/features/2026/5/4/hegemonic-power-how-modis-bjp-won-indias-bengal-for-the-first-time) in the polls and has rejected the results, accusing the federal government
accusations that they were transporting beef. Banerjee, who is seeking a fourth consecutive term, has time and again warned that if the BJP were to come to power, they would “ban fish, meat, and even
Mamata Banerjee – India’s most powerful female politician – has dramatically refused to resign after she lost elections to the prime minister’s party this week. On Monday, Narendra Modi’s Bharatiya Janata party (BJP
Mamata Banerjee (C), greets her supporters during a rally before the second phase of the legislative assembly elections in Kolkata on April 27, 2026 [Dibyangshu Sarkar/AFP] ## Inside Banerjee’s bastion in East Banerjee founded
Mamata Banerjee. Banerjee is no ordinary regional leader. In 2011 the firebrand politician achieved what many thought impossible, ending 34 uninterrupted years of Communist rule in West Bengal and dismantling one of the world
BJP has never won. The Trinamool Congress (TMC), one of India’s key opposition parties led by Mamata Banerjee, a fiery 71-year-old Modi critic, has governed the state since 2011, ending a record
Mamata Banerjee of the ruling Trinamool Congress, who is seeking a fourth consecutive term, has warned that the main opposition BJP "threatens Bengal's way" of life, invoking fish and rice as non-negotiable
Mamata Banerjee, brought it down in 2011. The state also remained relatively peaceful during some of the most tumultuous periods in modern India. In 1984, anti-Sikh riots erupted in many states following the assassination
Mamata Banerjee, dominated the next 15 years until now. Political scientists have long described Bengal as a system that favours "hegemonic" parties. Analysts see the outcome not as a sudden upheaval but as the culmination