12 resultsfor “Labour MPs views on leadership change”
leadership speculation, and Starmer’s rock-bottom public approval ratings, the most likely scenario remains that he stumbles on. The quiet, loyal majority of the parliamentary [Labour](https://www.theguardian.com/politics/labour) party may feel deeply despondent
view. Here is the story by the Guardian’s political editor, **Pippa Crerar,** setting up what is happening today. In a separate analysis, Pippa writes: “[Labour MPs] know the public has been losing faith
MPs willing to back their candidates for an immediate challenge to Starmer. But Burnham supporters said they hoped to convince the prime minister of the need for a more stable transition – rather than a bloody
Labour MPs have been appalled by the recurring reminder that Starmer personally decided to appoint someone with Mandelson’s reputation to the UK’s most sensitive diplomatic post, and warned that his leadership
change their views, with Unison the key target. Others, like GMB, have ruled out supporting Burnham because of his closeness with Ed Miliband, who is at odds with the union over oil and gas licences
change that [will affect] all of these situations. We’ve still got to tackle these big issues, and we’ve got to do it in the right way with the right values. Having some side
viewed suspiciously by some in the 2024 intake as aloof and dismissive of those who had won seats in the south, Burnham has been making efforts to build bridges. Now many Labour MPs say they
view was "he wasn't allowed to provide this information to me". Allies of Sir Olly have argued he had a duty not to disclose details of the vetting, which are highly intrusive and personal
viewed less favourably, such as her [decision last month](https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2026/mar/17/angea-rayner-labour-out-of-time-reforms-people-want) to label as “un-British” proposed changes to immigration rules, in a speech in which she also said Starmer could not “go through
changed', and trying to find that candidate who can re-inspire the party, never mind the voters, is proving elusive. The one thing left and right seem to agree on is that there
view at the time, and more that it is something he is willing to share publicly now. He also said, on Good Morning Britain, that it was "a fair point" that enough was already known
changed [since I wrote about the level of doom last month](https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c4gd7kxdk37o). Unless you've been living on another planet, you'll have heard or read plenty of talk, and it's serious