27 resultsfor “Details about Lord Mandelson's vetting process”
details of the vetting, other than the outcome of the process, would have been against the rules - Dropping Lord Mandelson
details of the vetting, only his final decision on the case. Sir Olly also said that his department faced "an atmosphere of pressure" over completing the process to clear Lord Mandelson
Lord Mandelson failing vetting, should No 10 have been more curious? No 10 said there had been repeated requests for "assurances" from the Foreign Office about the "facts of this case", including vetting. Developed vetting
Lord Mandelson security clearance after a vetting process was not affected by pressure from No 10 Downing Street. But Sir Olly also [told the committee](https://committees.parliament.uk/oralevidence/17501/pdf/) that "my office and the foreign secretary
details from the "confidential" vetting process would "never be shared with No 10 or the prime minister". Asked about Sir Olly's effective sacking on Thursday, Lord McDonald said: "I cannot see that there
process has now been changed. Details of the due diligence checks made before Lord Mandelson's appointment, which were carried out by the Cabinet Office on behalf of Number 10, are still to emerge
Lord Mandelson needed to undergo so-called developed vetting for his security clearance. They eventually decided he did. Others lay bare the scramble to complete the vetting process as quickly as possible, amid what
process to appoint Lord Mandelson. Lord Mandelson was announced as the UK's ambassador to the US in December 2024, with the peer then undergoing in-depth vetting to obtain his required security clearance
detail about Lord Mandelson's vetting should be included in the cache. In other words, there was the prospect it might not be, and not long later it did then see the light
details of the vetting, which are highly intrusive and personal, as this would undermine the process. He is due to give evidence to the Commons Foreign Affairs Commitee on Tuesday morning. Labour MP Dame Emily
Lord Peter Mandelson and Pat McFadden. Photograph: Cabinet Office/PA The Metropolitan police had already asked that emails between Morgan McSweeney and Mandelson over his links to convicted child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, be held back
details of Mandelson’s personal life, and financial and business dealings – which the prime minister is also believed to have now seen – as well as the recommendation that Mandelson had failed vetting
detail ahead of [giving evidence to MPs on the Foreign Affairs Committee next week](https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c5yjl1pmv55o). McSweeney is likely to be asked by the committee about whether he put pressure on civil servants
details on conflict of interests and any action agreed to address any conflicts, also does not appear. Sir Keir Starmer has previously accused Lord Mandelson of not fully disclosing the extent of his relationship with
process," he said, adding: "The prime example is a vetting file held by UK Security Vetting (UKSV)." Last month, it was revealed that UKSV had recommended against clearing Lord Mandelson
detail of vetting, so I would remember if this had ever been raised with me.” Robbins received the vetting outcome after Starmer had already announced Mandelson’s appointment and, despite a separate due diligence process
process at the time, but conceded there were some "time pressures" on the Foreign Office to confirm him ahead of Donald Trump's return to the US presidency. On the departure of Sir Olly, Lammy
Lords, Mandelson needed full vetting. The advice was that while it was ultimately up to the Foreign Office, vetting was needed, she added. 3. --- ## 3. There is seemingly no paper trail for Keir Starmer approving
details of those investigations would not have been passed on to Number 10 or ministers. As sources told me in the autumn, and government still says publicly now, no concerns were raised with ministers
process was under way in January 2025, Mandelson is understood to have received sensitive Foreign Office briefings on China. Philip Barton, Robbins’ predecessor as permanent secretary, told MPs last month that the briefings “must have