74 resultsfor “What did Mandelson say about Epstein”
say goodbye. Watcha want me to do – Burst out cryin!! NO FUN – NOT WORTH IT!!” Tartaglione, who is serving four consecutive life sentences for drug-related murders, had previously referenced the existence of the note
says after WhatsApp messages revealed Labour MPs are not looking to raise taxes to fund more benefits, the cabinet minister [Nick Thomas-Symonds](https://www.theguardian.com/politics/nick-thomas-symonds) has said. In messages between the work and pensions
says It was a mistake to announce [Peter Mandelson](https://www.theguardian.com/politics/peter-mandelson) as the UK’s ambassador to the US before he was security vetted for the role, one of Keir Starmer’s senior ministers
say they were the victims of attacks in Britain detailed in the Epstein files. The force said the claims were historic, dating to the 1980s and 1990s, with one in Surrey and allegations concerning [Berkshire
says Labour has ‘no magic bullet’ as MPs brace for heavy losses in local elections Labour’s deputy leader has warned there will be “no magic bullet” to solve Labour’s problems – or major challenges
say. Officials eventually decided clearance was needed. The documents published on Mondayshed new light on the appointment of Mandelson as the UK’s ambassador to Washington. But despite [running to about 1,500 pages
says Downing Street considered giving the prime minister's then-director of communications Lord Doyle an ambassador role, the former top civil servant at the Foreign Office has said. Sir Olly Robbins made the claim
says Formal security vetting and due diligence appears not to have been carried out before the appointment of [Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor](https://www.theguardian.com/uk/prince-andrew) as a trade envoy, the government has said, as it emerged
Epstein. The release, split into three volumes, cost over £1m to assemble and is more than 10 times the size of first batch of files [released in March](https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cd70lgywgqqo). The documents are still
Epstein’s emails. MPs on the cross-party foreign affairs select committee were grilling the most senior civil servants involved in Mandelson’s appointment about the vetting and due diligence. Just over an hour
says A powerful parliamentary committee tasked with reviewing files relating to Peter Mandelson’s appointment as US ambassador has revealed that the government is withholding his vetting file despite not having the authority
says that he intends to "get on with governing" as no formal leadership challenge has been launched. But how could MPs who want to see Sir Keir replaced force a leadership contest and how would
say he is irritated by the description of being Mandelson’s “protege” which they see as being Mandelson wishing to portray himself as far more vital to the project than he was. But if that
Mandelson had failed the UKSV process. If the prime minister can’t be trusted with the most sensitive information, then who can? But Olly would rather get the sack than use his own initiative