69 resultsfor “Iran nuclear talks US response”
Nuclear talks are deferred. Iran received a US response via Pakistan on Sunday. Neither side
response, Trump took to his platform Truth Social, saying Merz thought it was "OK for Iran to have a Nuclear Weapon" and "doesn't know what he's talking about". This was soon followed
response, Trump took to his platform Truth Social, saying Merz thought it was "OK for Iran to have a Nuclear Weapon" and "doesn't know what he's talking about". This was soon followed
US-Iran ceasefire grows, days after the president [called off the latest round of talks](/news/liveblog/2026/4/26/iran-war-live-tehran-rejects-talks-under-siege-trump-cancels-envoys-trip) with Tehran. Although Washington said it was reviewing Tehran’s proposal, it reportedly received a lukewarm response, with
response, Trump took to his platform Truth Social, where he said Merz thought it was "OK for Iran to have a Nuclear Weapon" and "doesn't know what he's talking about". "No wonder Germany
nuclear programme and reopen the Strait of Hormuz. An Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson quoted by Iran’s ISNA news agency said on Wednesday that Tehran would convey its response. US President Donald Trump said
response to Iran’s 14-point proposal via Pakistan, and that Tehran was now reviewing it. - **“At this stage, we do not have nuclear negotiations,” state media quoted Iran’s foreign ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei
talks on Iran’s nuclear programme. Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi met Russian President Vladimir Putin in Saint Petersburg, saying Tehran is considering a US request to resume negotiations. The comments signal cautious movement
US under Trump twice attacked Iran amid ongoing indirect talks over Iran’s nuclear programme, a fact that has cast a long shadow over the most recent bout of diplomacy. “Clearly, there have been several
response” to any further aggression. - **Iran may soften nuclear stance after war:** Analyst Negar Mortazavi said Tehran could show greater flexibility on its nuclear programme once the conflict ends, though she added that Iran
response has been largely dismissive. According to Reuters, an unnamed US official said President Trump was unhappy with the proposal because it did not include provisions for Iran’s nuclear programme. The official noted that
talking points on the US-Israel war on Iran are being picked up by the Trump administration. The organisation, which had fiercely opposed the 2015 nuclear deal, occupies a carefully cultivated position in the corridors
talks in Islamabad last month, but efforts to arrange further meetings have been abortive. Trump has repeatedly cited Iran’s nuclear programme as a justification for the war and has insisted Iran must surrender
talk about the fact that it’s OK for [Iran](https://www.theguardian.com/world/iran) to have a nuclear weapon, and I don’t think that’s very good. “I think he’s endangering
talks in the Pakistani capital. But the diplomatic push comes amid increasing tension, as Iran warns it could expand its response to the US naval blockade beyond its own waters. Divisions in Washington persist, with
talks Obama conceded Iran could enrich for 15 years, but only at the level of purity required for a civilian nuclear programme – 3.67%. The agreement did not explicitly grant Iran a right to enrich
nuclear issues and the Strait of Hormuz”. Those messages were not, however, part of any negotiations, Fars said. Trump last week indefinitely extended the ceasefire that the US and Iran agreed to on April
nuclear energy for peaceful purposes”. “In demanding that Iran have no enrichment, the United States is denying Iran its rights under this treaty,” she told Al Jazeera. “In insisting that its right to enrichment
nuclear programme has been one of the key sticking points between the two sides. "They [Iran] want to make a deal. We've had very good talks over the last 24 hours
nuclear non-proliferation treaty. US official Christopher Yeaw said Iran’s selection was an “affront” to the treaty. Tehran’s envoy to the International Atomic Energy Agency, Reza Najafi, rejected the US statement as “baseless