Victims of sexual violence distressed by MPs’ ‘pugnacious’ questioning

Victims of rape and sexual violence have told parliamentarians they felt anxious and distressed during a Westminster evidence session, with one stating that witnessing “pugnacious” questioning had resulted in her “breaking down, sobbing and struggling to breathe”.

The victims’ commissioner has made a formal complaint to the chair of an influential group of MPs after a highly charged evidence session carried out by the public bill committee for the courts and tribunals billabout controversial changes to jury trials.

Claire Waxman told MPs that she could not “in good conscience, encourage victim-survivors to participate in evidence sessions conducted in a manner that may expose them to retraumatisation or emotional harm”. Other victims’ organisations, including Rape Crisis and Women’s Aid, have also raised concerns after an evidence hearing that included robust questioning and some terse exchanges.

One victim told MPs that she had felt “shocked, upset and extremely distressed” at some of the questioning she heard. Morwenna Loughman wrote in comments published alongside the letter that she felt it had “crossed the line into disrespect and pugnaciousness”.

She added: “As a victim-survivor I immediately felt threatened and attacked, thrust back into fight or flight.” Loughman said the questioning had “played a large part” in her having an emotional breakdown and she was “sobbing and struggling to breathe after questioning”.

Another survivor, Jade Blue McCrossen-Nethercott, said the session had been “difficult to watch” and that the line between scrutiny and cross-examination had, at times, been crossed. A third, Charlotte Meijer, said that the way Waxman had been questioned made her feel “like I was back in court” and said she was anxious the same would happen to her in her later evidence session.

At one point during the evidence, the shadow justice minister Kieran Mullan questioned Waxman about a letter in which 30 organisations representing victims of violence against women and girls (VAWG) urged the justice secretary, David Lammy, to drop plans to significantly reduce the number of jury trials.

Mullan asked the commissioner if she accepted the letter referenced the impact of the limiting of jury trials on victims. Waxman replied that it focused on victims who were also defendants and said he should read the whole letter. Mullan said: “I have read it, and I have just read you a quote. If you do not want to take a common quote at its face value, that is fine.” Waxman responded: “Can I just remind you that we have victims in the room, and I think that is really important?”