Czech president Petr Pavel warns Russia will be Europe’s main security threat for decades – Europe live
Czech President warns Russia will be Europe's main security threat for decades.
The Guardian World1 min read
UN adopts resolution supporting international court’s climate ruling
TL;DR
The UN General Assembly has adopted a resolution supporting the International Court of Justice's ruling that states must act to prevent the worsening climate crisis. A total of 141 member states voted in favor, marking a significant step for climate justice.
Key points
- UN General Assembly voted to support ICJ's climate ruling
- 141 member states voted in favor of the resolution
- The ruling emphasizes legal responsibility to address climate change
- Vanuatu's climate minister called it a victory for frontline communities
- Resolution highlights climate change as a matter of law and human rights
Mentioned in this story
United Nations General AssemblyInternational Court of JusticeRalph RegenvanuVanuatu
The United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) has voted to support a landmark ruling from the International Court of Justice (ICJ), which found states have a legal responsibility to act to prevent the climate crisis from worsening.
More than two-thirds of UN member states, 141, voted in favour of the resolution on Wednesday, with eight voting no and 28 abstaining.
Ralph Regenvanu, the minister for climate change from Vanuatu, which championed the case, described the vote as a victory for “communities on the frontlines of the climate crisis”.
“Today the international community affirmed that climate change is not only a political and economic challenge, but a matter of law, justice, and human rights,” Regenvanu said in a statement.
“For vulnerable countries like Vanuatu, this resolution is deeply significant because it confirms that no State is above its obligations to protect people, future generations, and our planet.”
The historic ruling from The Hague-based court in July last year found that states have a legal obligation to act on the “existential threat” of climate change.
The case was the biggest ever to be considered by the ICJ’s 15 judges, who reviewed tens of thousands of pages of written submissions and heard two weeks of oral arguments before delivering their verdict.
The case came to the court at the request of the UNGA after a resolution led by Vanuatu was adopted by consensus in March 2023.
Wednesday’s vote, by contrast, attracted a number of objections, with Belarus, Iran, Israel, Liberia, Russia, Saudi Arabia, the United States and Yemen voting no.
Al Jazeera reported in February that the US had sent a diplomatic cable urging UN member states not to support the resolution.
“We are strongly urging Vanuatu to immediately withdraw its draft resolution and cease attempting to wield the Court’s Advisory Opinion as a basis for creating an avenue to pursue any misguided claims of international legal obligations,” a copy of the cable seen by Al Jazeera stated.
Wesley Morgan, a fellow with the Climate Council, an Australian nonprofit, said the vote confirmed states had a legal duty to act on climate change.
“This landmark resolution is a massive victory for Vanuatu and the Pacific leaders who have spent decades fighting for survival on the frontlines of the climate crisis and a warning for Australian governments,” Morgan said in a statement.
Q&A
What was the UN General Assembly's recent vote about climate change?
The UN General Assembly voted to support a ruling from the International Court of Justice that mandates states to take action against the climate crisis.
How many countries supported the UN resolution on climate responsibility?
141 countries voted in favor of the resolution, while eight voted against it and 28 abstained.
Why is the resolution significant for vulnerable countries like Vanuatu?
The resolution is significant for vulnerable countries as it reinforces their legal rights to demand action against climate change and holds states accountable for their responsibilities.
