A former Iranian negotiator revealed alleged secret letters from the supreme leader, claiming the negotiating team exceeded its mandate. His statements led to calls for legal action and sparked tensions within the government.
Key points
Mahmoud Nabavian revealed alleged secret letters from the supreme leader.
He claimed the negotiating team exceeded its mandate.
Nabavian faces prosecution and dismissal from parliament.
The state broadcaster cut off his interview and removed the archive.
His statements sparked tensions within the Iranian government.
A former member of Iran’s negotiating team in the previous round of talks in Islamabad is facing the threat of prosecution and dismissal from parliament after he went on the main state broadcaster to reveal what he claimed were confidential letters from the country’s supreme leader.
The interview with Mahmoud Nabavian, the deputy chair of Iran’s national security council, was eventually cut off, but only after he said he had seen secret correspondence written by Mojtaba Khamenei in which the ayatollah allegedly said Iran’s negotiating team had overstepped its mandate
An hour after the censored broadcast, the archive of the interview was removed and a senior official at the broadcaster resigned.
His claims were dismissed by a spokesperson for the negotiating team as old and distorted. The state broadcaster said Nabavian’s statements were “evidence of a legal violation and worthy of legal prosecution”.
Members of the camp of Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, the chief negotiator at the current talks in Switzerland, called for the leaker to be identified. Centrists and reformists have long argued the state broadcaster IRIB acts as an agent for hardliners in the Paydari or Stability Front, of which Nabavian is a supporter.
Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf and Abbas Araghchi talking while sat on an airplane
The Iranian parliament speaker, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf (centre), and Iran’s foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, en route to Zurich, Switzerland on Saturday. Photograph: Hamed Malekpour/Reuters
The episode, apart from revealing tensions at the top of government in near real time, also appear to show that the newly-appointed supreme leader has been taking a much more hands-on approach to the talks than previously known, and has also been ordering the negotiators not to relent on the nuclear file or the immediate payment of tolls to Iran by ships in the strait of Hormuz.
Khamenei has not been seen in public, or issued an audio tape, operating through written statements. Some reports suggest the negotiating team once had to wait a fortnight before securing his guidance on how the talks should proceed, and that he would send detailed questions to the negotiators.
Q&A
What did Mahmoud Nabavian reveal about Iran's negotiating team?
Mahmoud Nabavian claimed to have seen secret correspondence from the supreme leader stating that Iran's negotiating team had overstepped its mandate.
What consequences is Nabavian facing after his revelations?
Nabavian is facing potential prosecution and dismissal from parliament following his controversial interview.
How did the Iranian state broadcaster respond to Nabavian's claims?
The state broadcaster cut off Nabavian's interview and later removed the archive, labeling his statements as evidence of a legal violation.
What are the implications of Nabavian's claims for Iran's political landscape?
Nabavian's claims have intensified tensions within the Iranian government, particularly between hardliners and reformists, and raised questions about the role of the state broadcaster.
Trump says beleaguered reflecting pool will ‘probably’ be drained for repairs
Donald Trump announced that the Lincoln Memorial reflecting pool will likely be drained for repairs due to algae blooms and peeling paint. He attributed some issues to vandalism and mentioned that several arrests have been made related to the pool's condition.
Khamenei’s MoU stance stirs debate as Iran and US meet in Switzerland
Iran and the US are negotiating in Switzerland to advance a memorandum of understanding aimed at ending the recent conflict. Supreme Leader Khamenei's hesitant support for the deal has sparked debate among Iranian officials and the public.
See every story in News — including breaking news and analysis.
In a letter to Iran’s president, Masoud Pezeshkian, that Khamenei published on Thursday, he said he took a different view on the outcome of the talks to the president, but had deferred to his judgment on certain conditions.
Nabavian claimed the supreme leader had in fact set 11 conditions for continuing the negotiations, including receiving compensation from the US, maintaining the right to uranium enrichment, lifting sanctions, releasing Iran’s frozen assets and exercising full sovereignty over the strait of Hormuz, including the immediate charging of fees.
According to Nabavian, Khamenei emphasised “Iran’s monopoly on the management of the strait of Hormuz, collecting tolls from passing vessels, restrictions on enemy ships, and allocating the revenues from the tolls to the people, families of martyrs, and veterans.”
Mojtaba Khamenei and Ali Khamenei depicted on billboards
Mojtaba Khamenei, left, and his late father Ali Khamenei depicted on billboards in Beirut, Lebanon. Photograph: Anadolu/Getty Images
The reopening of the waterway should only happen when the US agreed to pay compensation, he ordered. The US has agreed to set up a $350bn (£264bn) development fund, but said it will not contribute.
Nabavian also claimed Khamenei wrote in a message to the negotiating team: “What was agreed upon in the Pakistan talks is completely different from what was supposed to happen and was a condition for the legitimacy of the talks, and the talks must be stopped.” He was referring to the talks in Islamabad in which the negotiating team did discuss aspects of Iran’s nuclear programme.
Later on a Telegram channel, Nabavian continued the argument, saying he has not released secret documents and was only revealing the truth.
He said that, based on the memorandum of understanding, “four issues had to be implemented before negotiations could begin: 1. End of the occupation in Lebanon and complete withdrawal 2. The release of our frozen money by America. Not borrowing from Qatar. 3. Lifting the siege 4. Temporary lifting of sanctions.”
He questioned whether these four preconditions had been met before foreign ministry officials went to Geneva for negotiations, and further asked: “Does that mean that people should not be aware of what the imam’s orders were and why the agents disobeyed them?”