TL;DR
Former senator Linda Reynolds has repaid nearly $8,800 in parliamentary expenses after her partner claimed allowances for visits to his son in Melbourne. She accepted the ruling from the Independent Parliamentary Expenses Authority, which included a penalty loading.
Former Liberal senator Linda Reynolds has paid back nearly $8,800 in parliamentary expenses after her partner claimed family reunion allowances to visit his son in Melbourne while en route to meet her in Canberra.
Reynolds accepted the ruling of the Independent Parliamentary Expenses Authority (IPEA) but initially disputed their ruling, saying her partner’s visits to his son – her stepson – were necessary after “high profile (and false) 2021 workplace allegations made against me”, seemingly a reference to her long-running court dispute with former staffer Brittany Higgins.
The IPEA, which administers the use of political spending and travel, last week published a number of recent reviews into parliamentarians’ expenses. Labor MP Louise Miller-Frost repaid more than $4,100 after travelling to Perth with her husband several days before a committee hearing, while Liberal senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price repaid $387 after blaming an “oversight” for claiming an extra day of travel allowance.
Reynolds, a former defence minister who left parliament at the May 2025 federal election, was required to repay $8,778.01 after three trips her partner took between Perth, Melbourne and Canberra in May and June 2025.
In a statement to Guardian Australia, Reynolds said she repaid the amount, which included a 25% penalty loading.
“At the time of undertaking the travel I believed it was within the rules. IPEA took a different view which I accept,” she said.
In a September 2025 email to Reynolds, the IPEA raised concern that on each occasion, her partner “appears to have stayed for two nights in Melbourne without you, before joining you in Canberra”, adding: “there are no provisions in the legislation for personal stopovers when travelling for family reunion purposes”.
Sign up for the Breaking News Australia email
The IPEA found, in its review published online, that three trips between Perth and Melbourne were “not to accompany or join Ms Reynolds” but instead “for the predominant purpose, as stated by Ms Reynolds in her correspondence, of spending time with their son.”
The IPEA said family travel entitlements were for “spending time and facilitating family life with the member, not broader family,” ruling all three trips to Melbourne did not meet the guidelines. It found the subsequent travel from Melbourne to Canberra, however, was consistent with the legislation.
Parliamentarians are entitled to , allowing close family members to join them on occasion when travelling away from home – for example, to Canberra for parliament sitting, or other locations for committee hearings. IPEA states a spouse or nominee is entitled to the equivalent of nine business class return airfares from their home city to Canberra, and an additional three business return airfares outside of Canberra.