TL;DR
Andy Burnham is adjusting his stance on fiscal rules to reassure bond market investors as he aims to replace Keir Starmer as prime minister. He now supports the government's current fiscal rules while planning to reduce debt.
Andy Burnham has always faced a narrow path to replace Keir Starmer as prime minister: a tricky byelection, a leadership contest that is yet to be declared, and a far from constructive bond market backdrop.
In making his pitch, assuaging City investors in particular has led the Greater Manchester mayor to dance on a pin.
Since warning last year that Britain was too “in hock” to the bond markets, the bookmakers’ favourite to replace Starmer has toned things down – suggesting at the weekend that he supported the government’s current fiscal rules and would have a plan to get debt down.
By their nature, the rules – self imposed limits on borrowing and debt – are a straitjacket worn by successive administrations to reassure those in the £2.9tn market for UK government debt that Britain is a safe bet.
“I have never said you can just ignore the bond markets,” he told ITV. “I said that politicians have placed Britain in hock because of the way in which we lost control of our finances and public spending.”
Amid febrile conditions in global markets, Burnham’s change in tack is understandable. Along with other advanced economies, the UK government’s borrowing costs have risen sharply amid the fallout from the Iran war.
Primarily, the rise in the yield – in effect the interest rate – on the UK’s long-term borrowing to the highest levels since 1998 reflects the impact of higher inflation on the UK, and the expectation that the Middle East war will hit growth more than elsewhere in the G7.
However, investors also take a view that a leadership fight is bad for business, and that a Starmer replacement would probably add to borrowing. In a country contemplating its sixth prime minister in seven years, many investors are weary of political instability.
Against this backdrop, Burnham’s “in hock” comments and talk of a radical policy agenda – involving the renationalisation of energy and water – have set him at a disadvantage in the City. Relatively speaking, investors favour keeping Starmer and the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, given their apparent readiness to burn political goodwill to balance the books.