22 resultsfor “reasons for Olly Robbins sacking”
reason why the overall vetting recommendation could not have been shared with him. He suggested that this was a key point of difference between him and Sir Olly Robbins, the former top civil servant
sack the Foreign Office civil servant Olly Robbins.”  Guardian splash Photograph: Guardian And this morning the saga continues, with **Cat Little**, permanent secretary at the Cabinet Office, giving evidence
Olly Robbins remains white hot, several days on from Keir Starmer’s decision to sack the senior Foreign Office civil servant. “It’s just total self-serving, narrow, selfish, political endgame stuff,” said one supporter
Robbins has accused Downing Street of taking a "dismissive approach" to vetting during Lord Mandelson's appointment as the UK's ambassador to the US. Sir Olly was sacked as Foreign Office boss last week
Robbins and did not appear to understand how vetting worked. “The dismissal of Sir Olly risks having a serious and sustained chilling effect on serving and prospective civil servants,” O’Donnell wrote. He said Starmer
Olly Robbins, granted Mandelson his “developed vetting” status anyway, paving the way for him to take up his post in Washington the following month. Robbins, who has since been sacked by [Keir Starmer](https://www.theguardian.com
reason this feels different is because it’s not factional,” one frontbencher said. “It’s not soft left, or SCG [Corbynites] – it’s actually lots of people now coming to make the same point
Olly Robbins, [fired by the prime minister](https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2026/apr/16/foreign-offices-top-civil-servant-olly-robbins-leaves-post-in-mandelson-vetting-row) as the Foreign Office’s permanent secretary after not informing him that Peter Mandelson had failed his vetting for the role of ambassador in Washington
Olly Robbins, the current permanent secretary in the Foreign Office, was the department’s top civil servant in late January 2025 when the decision was made, having taken up the role earlier that month
Olly.” Then, when she was asked why Robbins would not want the information to be shared, she said: “In the actual meeting, the specific reasons were not discussed.” Little made clear her account was based
sacked Lord Mandelson from the role in September 2025 over his links to the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, but has been facing ongoing questions about the appointment ever since. Sir Keir Starmer's former
Robbins accused No 10 of a "dismissive" attitude towards the process - a claim Downing Street has denied. Cat Little, the most senior civil servant at the Cabinet Office, will appear before the committee on Thursday
Olly said there was an “atmosphere of pressure” and “constant chasing” from Downing Street. - Whether he had seen the cover form for Lord Mandelson’s vetting by UK Security Vetting (UKSV), the agency responsible
Olly Robbins, the former permanent secretary at the Foreign Office. 1. --- ## 1. Robbins refused to give Little the summary of Mandelson’s vetting Little said her then-Foreign Office counterpart had [resisted sending
reason, Robbins sought to interject with an answer to quite a different question. “May I cut in, Chris?” Robbins said, before informing the committee that it was not normally the case that decisions would
Olly Robbins refused to hand Peter Mandelson’s vetting summary to the Cabinet Office, the civil servant who leads the department has said. The summary – which would have revealed that Robbins, the now-sacked Foreign
Robbins thought he could manage the risk. Now I’m sure that Olly is very, very clever. But for an intelligent man he came across as – how can I say this nicely
Robbins, who was sacked as the top civil servant at the Foreign Office last week after the department's decision to grant Lord Mandelson clearance emerged. Here are the key points from her evidence
Olly Robbins and reinstate him”. Simon McDonald, who once held Robbins’ job as top civil servant in the Foreign Office, said if [Keir Starmer](https://www.theguardian.com/politics/keir-starmer) had only waited to hear his evidence
sack Olly Robbins,” he says. “So, if they do turn on him, that might end up being the moment that the PM realises that what people are saying about him is not going to change