18 resultsfor “Keir Starmer Mandelson vetting controversy”
Keir Starmer, who is mired in controversy. "He still has monumental questions to answer in the House of Commons about what he knew about [Peter Mandelson's vetting
Mandelson: Keir Starmer faces attack from his own playbook The lexicon of a British parliamentary scandal is arcane. As [Keir Starmer](https://www.theguardian.com/politics/keir-starmer) fights to remain prime minister, he has had to respond
Keir Starmer and "told to get on with it". Sir Philip said he knew Epstein was "a controversial figure" in the US, adding: "I was worried that this could become a problem in future." "That
vetting, says Ed Davey A powerful Commons committee should investigate whether Keir Starmer misled parliament over the appointment of [Peter Mandelson](https://www.theguardian.com/politics/peter-mandelson) as ambassador to Washington, Ed Davey has said. The Liberal Democrat
Keir Starmer is looking increasingly isolated over his handling of the [Peter Mandelson](https://www.theguardian.com/politics/peter-mandelson) scandal with divisions emerging in cabinet over his decision to sack the Foreign Office civil servant Olly Robbins.”  on Monday afternoon
Starmer. But in front of MPs, Sir Olly defended his actions, insisting he had followed the proper process while under "constant pressure" from No 10 to get Lord Mandelson in post. No 10 denied claims
controversy – UK politics live Good morning and welcome to today’s live coverage of UK politics. Despite several calls for his resignation from within his own party, **Keir Starmer** told [the Sunday Times](https://www.thetimes.com
controversy are two documents. The first was produced by UKSV setting out its conclusion and explaining why it ranked Mandelson a “high concern”. The Cabinet Office on Friday published a template of that file
Keir Starmer is presented with flowers as he arrives at an airport in Beijing in January. Photograph: WPA/Getty Images While the vetting process was under way in January 2025, Mandelson is understood to have received
Keir Starmer’s former chief of staff Morgan McSweeney – long rumoured – which had asked him to “just fucking approve it”. Barton, who left the Foreign Office in January, said he was unaware of Number
Keir Starmer](https://www.theguardian.com/politics/keir-starmer), when he was dismissed from his role on Thursday. Robbins was sacked hours after the Guardian revealed that Peter Mandelson [failed his security vetting](https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2026/apr/17/keir-starmer-kept-in-dark-peter-mandelson-vetting-two-top-civil-servants) in January
controversies in years, did Starmer really not think to ask if Mandelson's security checks had come back clean? If you're feeling charitable, he, of course, is a pretty busy man. But then
Keir Starmer has said it was “unforgivable” that he was not told that [Peter Mandelson](https://www.theguardian.com/politics/peter-mandelson) had failed his security vetting before being appointed as ambassador to Washington. The prime minister said
Keir’s Starmer’s decision to sack Olly Robbins as the Foreign Office’s top official over the Peter Mandelson vetting scandal as they warned him not to [alienate the civil service](https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2026/apr/21/anger-whitehall-civil-service-olly-robbins-sacked-keir-starmer),