150 resultsfor “Trump warns Iran nuclear deal”
warned commercial vessels against accepting US escorts and threatened to attack if they entered the strait. Trump abandoned the effort after one day. ## May 14: Commercial vessels targeted again On May 14, an Indian cargo
warned that passing close to usual routes "should be considered extremely hazardous due to the presence of mines that have not been fully surveyed and mitigated." The head of security for the Baltic and International
warned that, in response to the Israeli attacks after the ceasefire, it would once more close the strait of Hormuz, the economically critical waterway it had agreed to open for the two-week duration
deal, and the Iranians are desperate to make one. But there has not yet been a definitive Iranian response to the U.S. proposal.  for wartime damages. The conflict, launched by the US and Israel
warned earlier this year that Washington would stop support for Iraq – if pro-Iran Nouri al-Maliki became Iraq’s prime minister. He later dropped out of the running. Let’s take a closer look
warned the war “has delivered a potentially fatal blow to a US-led international order that was already on life support”. Allies are hedging, middle powers are forming their own coalitions, and regions once firmly
warning Netanyahu against attacking Beirut in his pursuit of [Hezbollah](https://www.theguardian.com/world/hezbollah), a red line for Iran in terms of what it considered a violation of the broader regional ceasefire. Trump routinely uses public
warned the US against overstepping on the issue of Taiwan and stated that the [US-Israel war on Iran](/news/liveblog/2026/5/15/iran-war-live-trumps-visit-to-china-shadowed-by-conflict-with-tehran) should have never started. Both sides have released statements detailing what [Trump and Xi discussed
deal with the US. Pakistan, which has been mediating talks between Iran and the US, has led a renewed push in recent days to bridge the gap between the two parties. Pakistan’s army chief
deal to strengthen Nato". That, he said, was also in America's interest. A high-ranking German official said "Spain is a member of Nato. And I see no reason why that should change." While
nuclear programme, the unfreezing of Iranian assets and Israel’s continued war in Lebanon remain substantial obstacles to an agreement. 2. --- ## 2. What is the US hoping to achieve with this latest round of strikes
deal in 2018. Former negotiators of the JCPOA have told the Guardian that Iran’s closure of the strait of Hormuz, a line it was not previously willing to cross, had fundamentally altered the negotiations
nuclear weapon and would blow up [Italy](https://www.theguardian.com/world/italy) in two minutes if it had the chance.” Despite the diplomatic strain, Meloni described Washington as a “priority ally”. But, she added, alliances require candour
warned of a “crushing and regret-inducing response” to any more attacks against Iran’s southern islands and ports. The IRGC has also declared that the UAE’s critical port of [Fujairah](/news/2026/5/5/whats-the-significance-of-uaes-fujairah-hit-on-monday) sits
warned Iran was about to be struck “VERY HARD”, a threat which had sent oil prices up and stocks down. It has been another ride on the Trump rollercoaster, keeping traders on edge, most
warned for years that the US should avoid. With hostilities suspended yet nascent peace talks at an impasse, the vice-president’s role may become pivotal after Iranian regime insiders identified him as the person
deal”. Trump has previously said that targets for new US attacks would include power stations and other civilian infrastructure. Iran [appears unwilling to bend to Trump’s threats](https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/apr/19/trumps-sends-delegation-to-pakistan-for-possible-new-round-of-iran-war-talks), though analysts say there
warned on Monday](https://x.com/mb_ghalibaf/status/2063994394315825275?s=20) that Tehran would not tolerate what it called “repeated violation”. “So long as you lack a genuine willingness to build trust, Iran’s response will remain the same
warned, arguing sluggish American production and the “transactional nature” of the Trump administration have put the multi-billion-dollar defence deal at risk. The defence minister, Richard Marles, this week agreed to US requests