71 resultsfor “Mandelson appointment documents”
documents related to Lord Mandelson's appointment as ambassador to the US. The second is a stark
documents should be disclosed to a parliamentary committee to comply with a motion known as a “humble address”. That motion, passed in February, required the government to release “all papers” relevant to Mandelson’s appointment
Mandelson’s appointment. Under the terms of that motion, the most sensitive documents, such as Mandelson
documents that show Peter Mandelson had [failed security vetting](https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2026/apr/16/revealed-mandelson-failed-vetting-but-foreign-office-overruled-decision) before he assumed the role of US ambassador, the Guardian can reveal. Any such decision could amount to an extraordinary breach
Mandelson files, published earlier this week following MPs' vote to disclose documents relating to the disgraced peer's appointment
Mandelson appointment, MPs [voted earlier this year](https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2026/feb/04/labour-mps-peter-mandelson-jeffrey-epstein-intelligence-and-security-committee) to force the government to publish all documents
appointment but insisted due process was followed, accusing Mandelson of creating a “litany of deceit” about his Epstein ties and promising to release documents
Mandelson’s appointment. According to multiple sources, officials across government have been in dispute over whether to release documents
documents](https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/update-on-the-government-response-to-the-humble-address-motion?utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=govuk-notifications-topic&utm_source=756bdf98-cf25-4445-b1f9-19a5446c228d&utm_content=immediately) relating to Lord Mandelson's appointment as the UK's ambassador
Mandelson’s connections with Jeffrey Epstein when he appointed him ambassador. The documents published yesterday
Mandelson’s appointment. The government has repeatedly said it will comply with the motion, which ordered that any documents
document release totalled more than 1,500 pages. But some questions about the appointment remain unanswered. The files contain more than 160 pages of messages and WhatsApps between Lord Mandelson
appointment of Peter Mandelson as Washington ambassador despite the concerns of vetting officials. Olly Robbins, the former top official at the Foreign Office, said No 10 took a “dismissive” attitude to vetting, and Mandelson
Mandelson’s appointment, but it is expected to wait until the release of further documents
appointment with Mandelson related anguish would be the next deluge of documents Parliament has demanded
appointment of Peter Mandelson, and his vetting, we're none the wiser on the specifics because the information about the process was not among these documents
document appeared to contradict statements made by the prime minister and his former chief of staff, Morgan McSweeney, that implied vetting failures could partly be blamed for Mandelson’s appointment
documents published by the government have revealed messages between Lord Mandelson and ministers strongly criticising the prime minister, No 10 and Labour MPs. [The 1,500 pages cover](https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/update-on-the-government-response-to-the-humble-address-motion?utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=govuk-notifications-topic&utm_source=756bdf98-cf25-4445-b1f9-19a5446c228d&utm_content=immediately) communications about the appointment
document published last month showed Lord Case, the UK's top civil servant at the time, wrote to Sir Keir a month before Lord Mandelson was appointed
appointed. He said his predecessor, Philip Barton, had to be “very firm in person” for it to take place. He told the committee that Downing Street took a “dismissive” attitude to vetting and Mandelson