US workers overwhelmingly support union-backed policies on AI, poll says

US workers overwhelmingly support pro-worker policies on artificial intelligence (AI) and view labor unions as the most reliable protectors of workers from the effects of AI, according to a new poll released by the AFL-CIO, the largest federation of labor unions in the US.

More than nine out of 10 workers surveyed expressed support for policies on artificial intelligence that labor unions may fight for, including 95% supporting a requirement that a human be the final decision maker on any issues affecting individual workers and their employment.

Some 92% also support advanced guardrails against harmful uses of AI in workplaces and require transparency and accountability when employers use AI.

Every worker protection polled in the survey received support from at least 75% of those polled, including 75% supporting the expansion of opportunities for workers to form unions to protect their jobs from AI. The poll, conducted with David Binder Research, surveyed 1,588 respondents across the US from 14 April to 22 April.

The in-depth polling of workers’ sentiments toward AI comes as workers, through collective bargaining agreements, have increasingly been seeking and securing protections on how artificial intelligence is used in the workplace.

“It’s the latest way that companies can lay people off, reduce their workforce and cut corners by saying, ‘oh, well, we’ll just have AI do it,’ even if the results are bad, as we’re seeing. So I think it is important for workers to protect themselves,” said Anna Iovine, unit chair of the Ziff Davis Creators Guild, which won AI protections in their contract in 2024, including editorial integrity protections, transparency for when and how AI is used in the workplace, and no layoffs or reduced pay due to AI implementation.

Hannah Drummond, a registered nurse in North Carolina and a union member with National Nurses United, also fought to include AI protections in her union contract in 2024 to ensure it would not be used without workers’ approval. She noted some hospitals have been implementing AI for scheduling and in using algorithms to estimate if a patient is going to get sicker, despite errors in the statistical models.

“We have technology language that says no new technology at all can be implemented that affects the delivery of patient care without going through the union first, and no technology should de-skill or undermine our judgment,” said Drummond. “We should not be experimenting on our patients. Patients are not guinea pigs. Patients who participate in clinical trials have informed consent. AI is being used in hospitals without patients’ consent. This violates the heart of health care.”