
David Attenborough says he is 'overwhelmed' by 100th birthday messages
David Attenborough expresses gratitude for 100th birthday messages

US Chief Justice John Roberts stated that Supreme Court justices are not 'political actors' amid backlash over recent controversial decisions. He emphasized that their role is to interpret the law, not to make policy decisions.
Mentioned in this story
US chief justice John Roberts has insisted supreme court judges are not “political actors” amid outrage over its recent decision undermining the Voting Right Act, and other moves that have benefited Donald Trump and his allies.
“I think, at a very basic level, people think we’re making policy decisions, we’re saying we think this is how things should be, as opposed to what the law provides,” Roberts told a conference for judges and lawyers in Hershey, Pennsylvania, on Wednesday, according to the Associated Press. “I think they view us as purely political actors, which I don’t think is an accurate understanding of what we do.”
The supreme court is “simply not part of the political process”, Roberts claimed. He acknowledged, however, that some of its decisions may spark controversy. “One thing we have to do is make decisions that are unpopular,” he said, according to the AP.
The chief justice, a conservative nominated by Republican George W Bush in 2005, also reiterated his condemnation of threats against lower court judges. “That’s not appropriate and it can lead to very serious problems,” he said.
Roberts leads a court on which conservatives have held a six-justice majority since 2020, and handed down a series of decisions that have upended longstanding precedent and, in Trump’s second term, allowed many of his policies to take effect, at least temporarily.
Last week’s decision on the Voting Rights Act has greenlit a scramble by Republican-led states to enact new congressional maps that will break up districts drawn to elect Black lawmakers, who tend to be Democrats. That may amount to a major blow to the party’s long-term chances of controlling the US House of Representatives.
The court has also expanded use of a fast-track process known as the “shadow docket” to temporarily pause lower court rulings against the Trump administration, including his mass deportation policies and gutting of federal departments.
John Roberts insisted that Supreme Court justices are not political actors and that their decisions are based on legal interpretation rather than policy-making.
The backlash stems from recent decisions that have undermined the Voting Rights Act and benefited Donald Trump and his allies.
The conservative majority, which has been in place since 2020, has led to decisions that upend longstanding precedents and allow many of Trump's policies to take effect.

David Attenborough expresses gratitude for 100th birthday messages

No tanks at Russia's Victory Day parade signals Ukraine war issues

Inmate accused of murdering Ian Watkins said it would make him famous.

A judge has released a document believed to be Jeffrey Epstein's suicide note, though its authenticity is unverified.

Over 33 million signatures for 'Mbappe Out' petition amid controversy!

Kodak Black scheduled for court appearance on felony drug charge in Florida.
See every story in News — including breaking news and analysis.
During Joe Biden’s presidency, the Roberts court handed down landmark rulings overturning the constitutional right to abortion, and giving presidents some immunity for official acts.
The justices have not been entirely supportive of the Republican’s second-term agenda: in February, it found that many of the tariffs Trump had imposed were illegal.
But there have nonetheless been signs that the court’s split decisions on high-profile issues have raised tensions with the three liberal justices.
In an order this week allowing Louisiana to begin redrawing its congressional maps in light of the court’s decision against the Voting Rights Act, Ketanji Brown Jackson, a justice who was appointed by Joe Biden in 2022, dissented, calling the move “unwarranted and unwise”.
“The Court unshackles itself from both constraints today and dives into the fray. And just like that, those principles give way to power,” Jackson wrote.
That prompted a rebuke from Samuel Alito, a justice who, in a concurrence joined by fellow conservatives Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch, described the arguments laid out by Jackson as “trivial at best, and … baseless and insulting”.