
Supreme Court calls Louisiana's House map an 'unconstitutional racial gerrymander'
Supreme Court rules Louisiana's House map unconstitutional in 6-3 decision

The University of Sussex has successfully challenged a £585,000 fine related to freedom of speech, imposed by the Office for Students. The High Court ruled in favor of the university on several key issues, raising questions about the regulator's decision-making process.
Mentioned in this story
The University of Sussex has won its legal challenge of a record £585,000 fine over freedom of speech.
The fine was issued by the Office for Students (OfS), the regulator of England's universities, over the university's trans and non-binary inclusion policy which it said had a "chilling" effect on free speech.
On most of the issues raised by the university, the High Court found in its favour, including concerns about bias in how the decision was made.
The Vice Chancellor of Sussex said it raised serious questions about the regulator, while the OfS described the ruling as disappointing.
The High Court case did not consider what happened to Kathleen Stock, who left her job as professor of philosophy at Sussex after protests and threats over her view that gender was not more important than biological sex.
High Court judge Mrs Justice Lieven ruled on Wednesday whether a proper process was followed in issuing the fine, the size of which sent shockwaves through universities across England.
The fine was issued on the basis of Sussex's trans and non-binary policy, which included a requirement to "positively represent trans people" and warned against "transphobic propaganda".
In court, the University of Sussex had argued the trans and non-binary policy was not what is called a "governing document" and did not have the importance attached to it by regulator the OfS.
This concern was upheld by today's judgement, along with several other aspects of the process.
Perhaps most damaging for the regulator meant to oversee freedom of speech, the accusation of bias in the process was also upheld.
Mrs Justice Lieven said the OfS had "closed its mind" to anything that would lead to not finding failure to uphold freedom of speech and therefore fine the university.
The regulator was also found to have taken a flawed approach to deciding what was academic freedom.
As part of the investigation which led to the fine, the OfS interviewed Stock, but the court had heard it did not meet anyone from the university in person despite requests from the institution to discuss concerns.
Stock had faced repeated protests and threats while professor of philosophy at Sussex, in what became one of the most high-profile freedom of speech rows at a UK university.
Last August, after the fine was issued, a new freedom of speech law covering England's universities came into force giving the regulator even stronger powers.
A complaints system which will allow academics and visiting speakers to directly raise concerns will come into effect from this autumn, with the potential for multi-million-pound fines to be issued from April 2027.
The fine was issued by the Office for Students due to concerns that the university's trans and non-binary inclusion policy had a 'chilling' effect on free speech.
The High Court ruled in favor of the University of Sussex on most issues raised, including concerns about bias in the decision-making process of the regulator.
The Office for Students expressed disappointment with the ruling, which raised serious questions about its regulatory practices and decisions.

Supreme Court rules Louisiana's House map unconstitutional in 6-3 decision
Senior citizens rally for immigrant caregivers' Temporary Protected Status

A postwar olive harvest in Syria brings a taste of home amidst fears.

Mali refugees share harrowing tales of violence and escape to Mauritania

Suspect arrested after two Jewish people stabbed in London amid rising tensions.

US Supreme Court mandates Louisiana to redraw its congressional map for better Black voter representation.
See every story in News — including breaking news and analysis.
Josh Fleming, interim chief executive of the OfS, said they would " carefully consider the consequences of the judgement before deciding on next steps. "