Globalytic
GlobalyticPoliticsConflictsTechScienceHealthBusinessWorld

Globalytic

Independent world coverage — geopolitics, conflicts, science, and health — with AI-assisted editing and verification.

Sections

  • World
  • Politics
  • Conflicts
  • Tech
  • Science
  • Health
  • Business
  • World
  • All news
  • Search

Resources

  • About
  • RSS Feed
  • Search

Summaries and analysis may be AI-assisted. Content is for informational purposes only.

Not professional advice.

© 2026 Globalytic. All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. /News
  3. /Trump claims other presidents flouted war powers law. It's a mixed record
PoliticsAnalysisneutral

Trump claims other presidents flouted war powers law. It's a mixed record

BBC NewsMay 23 min readOriginal source →
Trump claims other presidents flouted war powers law. It's a mixed record

TL;DR

President Trump claims he doesn't need Congress's approval to continue military actions against Iran, citing past presidents who similarly bypassed war powers laws. He argues that previous commanders-in-chief viewed congressional authority as unconstitutional.

Key points

  • Trump claims he doesn't need Congress's approval for war with Iran
  • He cites past presidents who bypassed war powers laws
  • A critical two-month deadline for military action has expired
  • Trump views congressional authority as unconstitutional
  • He asserts that this authority has never been effectively used

Why it matters

The debate over presidential war powers and congressional authority has significant implications for U.S. military engagement and governance.

President Donald Trump has insisted he doesn't need congressional authorisation to continue the war with Iran, arguing that past US commanders-in-chief didn't seek such approval.

As a critical two-month deadline for the war expired on Friday, Trump said his predecessors considered Congress' authority to limit a president's war powers as "totally unconstitutional".

"So many presidents, as you know, have gone and exceeded it," Trump said when asked if he would seek congressional authorisation.

"It's never been used. It's never been adhered to."

"Nobody's ever asked for it before," Trump added.

The reality is more complicated, however.

Trump is required by a 1973 war powers resolution to "terminate any use of United States Armed Forces" in Iran 60 days after notifying Congress of the start of the war, unless lawmakers vote to continue the conflict.

The legislation was passed to limit the ability of then-President Richard Nixon to continue waging war in Vietnam.

Friday marked the 60th day since 28 February, when the administration notified lawmakers of the strikes against Tehran.

But Trump and Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth contend that the deadline clock paused when the current ceasefire went into effect.

It has sparked a debate about whether or not the truce counts towards the 60-day deadline.

Regardless, some of Trump's recent predecessors sought to comply with war powers authority vested in Congress.

In 1983, President Ronald Reagan received congressional approval to deploy US Marines in Lebanon inside of the 60-day notification window, ensuring the military campaign complied with the law.

President George HW Bush sought congressional authorisation for the 1991 Gulf War before launching Operation Desert Storm, even as he argued that approval from lawmakers wasn't required.

His son, George W Bush, won approval from Congress for wars he waged in Afghanistan (2001) and Iraq (2003).

But Trump is right that other presidents skirted round the war powers law.

Under President Bill Clinton, the 1999 US bombing campaign in Kosovo blew past the 60-day limit without him seeking authorisation from Congress.

The air campaign lasted 78 days.

President Barack Obama argued that the US military campaign in Libya in 2011 did not qualify as "hostilities" under the Nixon-era law, and continued the campaign past the 60-day window without congressional approval.

That Nato-led intervention ended up lasting more than seven months.

David Schultz, a professor of political science and legal studies at Minnesota-based Hamline University, told the BBC: "Just because other presidents haven't invoked it [the 1973 law] doesn't mean that what Trump is doing here is correct."

He added: "Here, Trump has basically committed us to combat without any support from Congress.

"And if we go back to the founding of this country, go back 1776, 1787, one of the fears that our framers had was strong executives committing us to wars without the support of the legislative branch."

Trump has frequently pointed out that the Iran hostilities have been short compared with other conflicts, citing the wars in Vietnam (19 years), Iraq (nearly nine years), World War Two (six years) and Korea (three years).

But with Washington and Tehran still deadlocked over control of the Strait of Hormuz and Iran's nuclear programme, Trump's off-ramp from the conflict is unclear.

As Obama said in 2014 of the US war in Afghanistan: "It's harder to end wars than it is to begin them."

Q&A

What did Trump say about congressional authorization for military action?

Trump stated he doesn't need congressional authorization to continue the war with Iran, claiming past presidents also bypassed this requirement.

What is the significance of the two-month deadline mentioned by Trump?

The two-month deadline marks a critical point for military actions, after which Trump asserted he would not seek congressional approval.

How have past presidents approached war powers according to Trump?

Trump argued that many past presidents have exceeded their war powers without seeking congressional approval, viewing such limitations as unconstitutional.

What does Trump mean by saying 'it's never been used' regarding war powers?

Trump suggests that the congressional authority to limit presidential war powers has never been effectively enforced or adhered to by previous administrations.

People also ask

  • Trump war powers statement
  • presidents bypassing Congress for military action
  • two-month deadline for Iran military action
  • historical context of war powers law
Load next article

Related Articles

‘Inadequate’: NSW police criticised for not getting out of cars after triple zero call reported woman being bashed
Politics

‘Inadequate’: NSW police criticised for not getting out of cars after triple zero call reported woman being bashed

NSW police face backlash after failing to act on assault report leading to woman's death.

The Guardian World·1h ago·1 min read
Football upstages politics as Iranians rally behind their team at World Cup

Football upstages politics as Iranians rally behind their team at World Cup

Al Jazeera English·1h ago
Two arrested during investigation into Dezi Freeman’s movements as police reveal killer likely travelled to NSW
Conflicts

Two arrested during investigation into Dezi Freeman’s movements as police reveal killer likely travelled to NSW

Two arrested as police investigate Dezi Freeman's movements after officer killings.

The Guardian World·1h ago·1 min read
40-year-old Cape Verde goalkeeper keeps favorite Spain to 0 goals at World Cup
World

40-year-old Cape Verde goalkeeper keeps favorite Spain to 0 goals at World Cup

Cape Verde's 40-year-old goalkeeper Vozinha shines in World Cup debut against Spain, keeping a clean sheet.

NPR Topics: News·1h ago·1 min read
AI could help win ‘race against extinction’ of vital plants, say botanists
Science

AI could help win ‘race against extinction’ of vital plants, say botanists

AI and digitisation could be key to saving vital plants from extinction.

The Guardian World·2h ago·1 min read
Mail on Sunday attacks Restore as split right creates headache for UK papers
Politics

Mail on Sunday attacks Restore as split right creates headache for UK papers

Mail on Sunday fiercely criticizes Restore Britain, urging support for Reform UK.

The Guardian World·2h ago·1 min read

More from News

View all →

See every story in News — including breaking news and analysis.

At a glance

  • Trump claims he doesn't need Congress's approval for war with Iran
  • He cites past presidents who bypassed war powers laws
  • A critical two-month deadline for military action has expired
  • Trump views congressional authority as unconstitutional
  • He asserts that this authority has never been effectively used

Advertisement

Placeholder