Starmer rejects calls to quit as pressure mounts over Mandelson vetting

TL;DR
Keir Starmer expressed anger over not being informed that Peter Mandelson failed security vetting before his appointment as UK envoy to Washington. Starmer plans to address the issue in Parliament, as calls for his resignation grow.
Key points
- Keir Starmer was unaware of Mandelson's failed security vetting.
- Starmer called the Foreign Office's failure to inform him staggering.
- Darren Jones stated the Foreign Office ignored security recommendations.
Mentioned in this story
Keir Starmer says he is “absolutely furious” that he was not informed that Peter Mandelson failed his security vetting before being appointed UK envoy to Washington, as the United Kingdom prime minister faced renewed calls to resign over the affair.
Starmer on Friday maintained that he was kept in the dark about the Foreign Office’s decision to overrule the recommendation of security officials not to give the job to the Labour Party grandee, who was fired in September over his links to the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
Starmer, who has asserted he knew nothing about the vetting outcome, said that the Foreign Office’s failure to inform him, as prime minister, was “staggering” and “unforgivable”, pledging to “set out all the relevant facts in true transparency” to Parliament on Monday.
The beleaguered prime minister said he only found out about the botched process on Tuesday, just before the revelations were published by The Guardian on Thursday, with top Foreign Office civil servant Olly Robbins ousted on the same day.
Darren Jones, the chief secretary to the prime minister, said Friday that “the recommendation was to not appoint Peter Mandelson to the role,” and that the Foreign Office ignored it. He said that was “astonishing”, but within the rules.
He said no government minister had been told of the security assessment, carried out by a department known as UK Security Vetting. People familiar with the process told The Associated Press that is standard practice because of the sensitive personal information involved, including “financial, personal, sexual, religious and other types of background information”.
Opposition Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch said claims the prime minister didn’t know were “completely preposterous”. “This story does not stack up. The prime minister is taking us for fools,” she told the BBC. “All roads lead to a resignation.”
Starmer has repeatedly insisted that “due process” was followed in the appointment, which was announced in December 2024, with Mandelson taking up the post in February, 2025.
He was sacked just seven months later, after documents released by a US Congressional committee revealed new details about the depth of his ties to Epstein.
Police have opened a probe into allegations of misconduct in office by Mandelson, who was arrested and bailed in February. Investigators are looking at allegations he leaked sensitive documents to Epstein when he was a government minister, including during the 2008 financial crash.
Q&A
Why did Keir Starmer express anger over Peter Mandelson's appointment?
Keir Starmer was furious because he was not informed that Peter Mandelson failed his security vetting before being appointed as UK envoy to Washington.
What did the Foreign Office do regarding Mandelson's security vetting?
The Foreign Office overruled the recommendation of security officials not to appoint Peter Mandelson, which Starmer found astonishing.
What actions is Keir Starmer planning to take in response to the Mandelson vetting issue?
Keir Starmer plans to present all relevant facts regarding the Mandelson vetting issue to Parliament on Monday.





