Scientists are training AI-powered robots to conduct lab experiments, significantly transforming scientific practices. Reshma Shetty from Ginkgo Bioworks highlights the impact of AI on her work, including AI-generated lab notebook entries.
Key points
AI robots are being trained for lab experiments
Reshma Shetty highlights AI's impact on scientific practices
AI can generate lab notebook entries
Initiative started by MIT graduate students
Programming cells seen as more important than programming computers
Mentioned in this story
Ginkgo BioworksReshma ShettyMIT
Reshma Shetty, co-founder and COO of Ginkgo Bioworks, walks through an autonomous lab where AI robots replace lab benches. Shetty says using AI has already fundamentally changed the way she practices science. “The really wild moment was the first time I saw a lab notebook entry written by the model,” she says.
Reshma Shetty, co-founder and COO of Ginkgo Bioworks, walks through an autonomous lab where AI robots replace lab benches. Shetty says using AI has already fundamentally changed the way she practices science. "The really wild moment was the first time I saw a lab notebook entry written by the model," she says.
Jodi Hilton for NPR
Jodi Hilton for NPR
Nearly two decades ago, four graduate students from MIT united around a shared idea. "We believed that programming cells would ultimately be more important than programming computers," says Jason Kelly.
Want the latest stories on the science of healthy living? Subscribe to NPR'sHealth newsletter.
It felt like an outlandish bet at the time. Things like gene editing or testing new molecules typically demanded many hours in the laboratory — carefully mixing hundreds of chemical cocktails by hand and pipetting them into petri dishes, tasks that required an enormous amount of human labor.
Q&A
How are AI robots changing laboratory experiments?
AI robots are being trained to conduct lab experiments, which fundamentally alters traditional scientific practices.
Who is Reshma Shetty and what is her role in AI lab experiments?
Reshma Shetty is the co-founder and COO of Ginkgo Bioworks, and she emphasizes how AI has transformed her approach to science.
What was the significance of the first AI-written lab notebook entry?
The first AI-written lab notebook entry marked a pivotal moment in demonstrating the capabilities of AI in scientific research.
What inspired the creation of AI-powered robots in laboratories?
The initiative began nearly two decades ago by MIT graduate students who believed programming cells would surpass the importance of programming computers.
See every story in News — including breaking news and analysis.
Digital generated image of african american ethnicity young man wearing suit standing on purple ramp and looking to multiple message chat icons. Artificial intelligence chatbot communication concept.
Then came the artificial intelligence boom. In 2014, Kelly remembers reading a blog post from Sam Altman, roughly a year before he went on to found OpenAI. Kelly recalls that Atlman wrote about the potential to automate biotechnology the same way he imagined automating other kinds of technology. The two started talking.
" I was like, man, thanks for this blog post," Kelly recalls. "We've been around for five years. It is impossible to raise money."
Eventually, the Silicon Valley money started flowing.
Shetty, left, and Jason Kelly are two of the four co-founders of Ginkgo Bioworks. The group met at MIT, where they hatched an idea to build an automated biotechnology lab. Kelly says it wasn’t a popular idea before the AI revolution. “We were living on ramen.”
Shetty, left, and Jason Kelly are two of the four co-founders of Ginkgo Bioworks. The group met at MIT, where they hatched an idea to build an automated biotechnology lab. Kelly says it wasn't a popular idea before the AI revolution. "We were living on ramen." Jodi Hilton for NPR
Jodi Hilton for NPR
Today Kelly runs a company, Ginkgo Bioworks, with his former classmates. It has an autonomous laboratory housed in a building overlooking the Boston harbor. Using robotics and AI, Kelly and his co-founders say that they are building the science labs of the future — where human scientists oversee robotic versions of themselves.
Pipetting robots
" Pipetting robots," Kelly says while giving a tour. "I'll show you where we do that."
Robots are arrayed around the lab, each working on separate science projects. They look nothing like humans — more like one-armed machines, each encased in glass like museum displays. A big screen at the front of the room shows a color-coded schedule of the experiments and each robot's tasks for the day. Below it a track resembling an oversized toy train set runs through the room, delivering equipment from one robot to another.
Gingko Bioworks does all kinds of work here including pharmaceutical, agricultural and government contracts. Current projects include engineering microbes for better fertilizer and creating proteins that will make snow or ice. They do a significant amount of research on pharmaceuticals.
The autonomous lab works on a range of pharmaceutical , agricultural, government and other projects. One current assignment includes engineering microbes for better fertilizer and creating proteins that will make snow or ice.
The autonomous lab works on a range of pharmaceutical , agricultural, government and other projects. One current assignment includes engineering microbes for better fertilizer and creating proteins that will make snow or ice.
Jodi Hilton for NPR
Jodi Hilton for NPR
"That one there," says Kelly, gesturing to a petri dish being ferried from one robot to another, "that has actual live cells in it."
To do this work, scientists use AI to translate experimental designs into instructions for robots about the work they need done in the lab.
Empowering the robots to be the scientists
Recently Gingko's scientists have been experimenting with taking things a step further – empowering the robot to be the scientist.
"The really, really wild moment was the first time I saw a lab notebook entry written by the model," says Reshma Shetty, another of the founders.
Shetty recently worked on a collaboration with OpenAI. Working through ChatGPT, they challenged the bot to create a certain protein. Typically, this level of thinking is left to the scientists, not unlike writing a recipe and handing it to a robot to execute. Now they were asking the bot to write the recipe for them.
"We had no idea if it would even be able to make protein," says Shetty.
The bot performed better than they expected. In comparison to human work, they concluded the protein synthesis was a 40 percent reduction in costs. It ran more than 30,000 experiments in 6 months. They've published these results, though the paper has not been peer reviewed.
Both Shetty and Kelly stress that humans are still needed to provide the right questions and constraints for experiments. Still, Shetty says it has already fundamentally changed the way she practices science.
Most of the robots in this lab do not resemble humans, and they perform their work while encased in glass.
Most of the robots in this lab do not resemble humans, and they perform their work while encased in glass.
Jodi Hilton for NPR
Jodi Hilton for NPR
"Normally, I rush through designing my experiment because I need to get it done so that I can actually do all the pipetting in the lab and set it all up," says Shetty.
Now, she says, she spends more time designing her experiments so that the robot can do them for her overnight.
New access to science comes with risks
Some people warn these new freedoms bring new dangers. Drew Endy, who studies bioengineering at Stanford, says that artificial intelligence opens the door to the possibility of people with little to no training in science running experiments with questionable goals.
He and some colleagues recently wrote a report illustrating the ways artificial intelligence could be used to do things like mass-produce viruses or create other biosecurity threats.
In general, says Endy, "I'm thrilled about AI and science right now as a researcher," but he is also worried about risks including potential bioweapons programs in other countries. "I'm not excited about that."
He notes that regulations and policy to mitigate these risks are within human reach, but need to be prioritized well in advance of a biotechnological disaster or warfare.
Until now, says Endy, biotechnology has been naturally insulated from these risks through intellectual gatekeeping. " Biology has traditionally been hard for people to really gain control over," he says. "AI could nudge it a little bit more towards concentration of power."
For better or worse, Jason Kelly says he foresees a day when the practice of science is democratized.
"I do think you'll have a culture clash," says Kelly, "coming of what happens when everyday people can ask scientific questions."
