
Wes Streeting resigns as health secretary - his letter in full
Wes Streeting resigns as Health Secretary after NHS improvements

A study reveals that investors view CEOs educated in private schools as a 'safer bet,' despite no evidence of superior performance compared to state-educated CEOs. Companies led by privately educated executives show 5% lower stock market volatility.
Chief executives who attended private school are perceived as a “safer bet” by investors, according to a study, despite there being no evidence they perform or behave differently to their state-educated counterparts.
Companies run by privately educated bosses tend to experience lower stock market volatility, even though there are no meaningful differences in their performance, decision-making or crisis management, the research from the University of Surrey found.
The stock volatility at firms led by this group was on average 5% lower, although the study found these executives did not take fewer risks, deliver better results or handle crises more effectively.
Instead, the effect was driven by investors’ perception that those with elite backgrounds were more competent or stable.
Investors may be mistaking privilege for competence when dealing with uncertainty, according to the study, published in the journal European Financial Management, highlighting a disparity between how financial markets judge bosses and how those leaders actually behave.
Dr Christos Mavrovitis, the co-author of the study and a senior lecturer in finance and accounting at the University of Surrey, said: “People like to think markets are purely rational, but our findings show that perception still plays a powerful role. A chief executive’s background can shape how investors feel about a company, even when it has no real impact on how that company is run.”
Researchers analysed decades of data on US firms, using private school attendance as an indicator of the socioeconomic background of the chief executive. They compared stock market volatility, company performance and corporate decisions at companies led by executives educated at private and state schools.
They found the impact of the perceived lower risk for the privately educated weakened over time as more information became available about a leader’s performance. It also fades in firms that face greater scrutiny by analysts or have higher levels of institutional investment, suggesting that better-informed investor rely less on social signals.
Separate research has previously shown that private school alumni tightened their grip on some of the most powerful and influential roles in British society between 2019 and last year, including in business and the media. This is despite just 7% of the UK population attending paying schools.
The 2025 report by the social mobility charity the Sutton Trust found that of the FTSE 100 chief executives educated in the UK, only a third (34%) attended a state comprehensive school, while almost two-fifths (37%) attended private school. FTSE 100 chairs were even more likely to be privately educated.
Investors perceive privately educated CEOs as more competent or stable, leading to a preference despite no evidence of better performance.
Companies run by privately educated CEOs experience, on average, 5% lower stock market volatility compared to those led by state-educated CEOs.
No, the study found no meaningful differences in decision-making or crisis management between privately educated and state-educated CEOs.

Wes Streeting resigns as Health Secretary after NHS improvements

Arcadia's Mayor Eileen Wang resigns after admitting to acting as a foreign agent for China.

Could Missouri's plan to eliminate state income tax be devastating? Experts think so.

Ronda Rousey and Gina Carano to fight on Netflix on May 16, 2026!

Trump's Beijing meeting with Xi focuses on trade and Taiwan tensions

All 129 MSPs, including 64 newcomers, sworn in at Scottish Parliament.
See every story in News — including breaking news and analysis.