US charges Cuba's Raúl Castro with murder over 1996 downing of two planes
Raúl Castro charged with murder by US over 1996 plane downing, reviving old charges.
BBC News1 min read
PGMO admits handball error on Man Utd goal v Forest
TL;DR
PGMO has acknowledged that Manchester United's second goal against Nottingham Forest should have been disallowed due to a handball. Referee Michael Salisbury initially rejected a VAR review that could have overturned the goal.
Key points
- PGMO admitted a handball error on Manchester United's second goal
- Referee Michael Salisbury rejected a VAR review
- Bryan Mbeumo's handball led to the goal being scored
Mentioned in this story
Michael SalisburyBryan MbeumoMatheus CunhaMatz Sels
Manchester UnitedNottingham Forest
Manchester United's second goal in Sunday's Premier League win over Nottingham Forest should have been disallowed for handball, Professional Game Match Officials (PGMO) has admitted.
The referees' body contacted Forest on Monday to confirm there had been a misjudgement by referee Michael Salisbury, who rejected a video assistant referee (VAR) review to rule out the goal.
The ball came off the arm of United forward Bryan Mbeumo before the Cameroon international saw a shot blocked by a defender.
Team-mate Matheus Cunha moved on to the loose ball and fired a shot past Forest keeper Matz Sels to score.
Salisbury was sent to the pitchside monitor by the VAR, Matt Donohue, to disallow the goal.
But Salisbury decided the handball was accidental and stuck by his on-field decision of goal.
It put United 2-0 up in a game they went on to win 3-2.
"From the angle I was standing at, it looked like he caught the ball," Forest midfielder Morgan Gibbs-White said after the game.
"Whether he scores or not, for me it was still a handball."
Referees' boss Howard Webb spoke to Forest to explain that while there could be justifiable reasons to judge this was not handball, a better decision, and one that would be expected, is for it to be disallowed.
The Premier League has a more lenient approach to handball, understanding the natural movements of players, but the VAR review should have been accepted.
Webb's view was shared by former Premier League assistant referee Darren Cann.
"While I think that it is commendable to see a referee stick with his original decision, I believe that football's expectation is Mbeumo controlling the ball, especially when it leads to a goal, outweighs the possible deflection off Mbeumo's hip," Cann told BBC Sport.
"Mbeumo does control the ball [with his hand] and while he's not the scorer himself, football's expectation is for that to be disallowed."
It was only the 17th time in seven seasons - and the fourth this season - that a referee has rejected the advice of the VAR at the screen.
Figure caption,
'The handball outweighs any possible deflection' - Cann
Q&A
Why was Manchester United's second goal against Nottingham Forest disallowed?
The goal was disallowed because it was determined that there was a handball by United forward Bryan Mbeumo before the goal was scored.
What did the PGMO admit regarding the referee's decision in the match?
The PGMO admitted that there was a misjudgement by referee Michael Salisbury, who should have disallowed the goal after reviewing the VAR.
Who was the referee involved in the controversial goal decision for Manchester United?
The referee involved in the decision was Michael Salisbury, who initially ruled the goal valid despite the handball.
