The key moments that decided the Premier League title race
After 22 years, Arsenal celebrates Premier League title victory!
BBC News1 min read
More than 60 Labour MPs call for review of UK voting system
TL;DR
Over 60 Labour MPs are urging a review of the UK's first-past-the-post voting system, citing it as 'broken.' They support a national commission to explore electoral reforms amid rising multi-party politics.
Key points
- Over 60 Labour MPs are calling for a review of the voting system
- They label the first-past-the-post system as 'broken'
- A national commission is proposed to examine electoral reforms
- Critics say it undermines democracy with low vote shares
- Multi-party politics has reignited calls for reform
More than 60 MPs are calling for a rethink of the UK's first-past-the-post voting system, which they have labelled "broken".
They are backing a new national commission to examine the current system for elections to the House of Commons and recommend reforms.
Critics have long said the first-past-the-post system means candidates can be elected on a relatively low share of the vote, undermining democracy, but defenders say it means decisive results and, in theory, more stable government.
The new political backdrop of multi-party politics which has emerged in recent years, with smaller parties challenging Labour and the Conservatives, has reignited calls for electoral reform.
First past the post is the voting system for UK general elections and elections to English councils.
This means the candidate with the most votes wins in a constituency and becomes an MP, while the party with the most MPs wins the election.
Reform UK, the Lib Dems, the Green Party, SNP and Plaid Cymru have all argued for a more proportional voting system.
This would link a party's share of seats in Westminster more closely to the share of votes they receive overall.
Elections to the Welsh and Scottish Parliaments use a proportional voting system.
The Conservatives want to stick with first past the post.
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer supported electoral reform during his bid to become Labour leader in 2020 but has since dropped his pledge and did not include it in the party's 2024 general election manifesto.
Some 64 Labour MPs have now signed up to an amendment to the Representation of the People Bill, calling for a national commission on electoral reform.
The government's bill includes extending the right to vote to 16 and 17-year-olds.
The amendment has been tabled by Alex Sobel, the Labour MP for Leeds Central and Headingley.
Sobel, who is also chairman of the All Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) for Fair Elections, urged MPs from all parties to join the "common sense" call ahead of the bill's expected return to the Commons next month.
"The prime minister in his reset speech said 'a return to the status quo would not be enough for people'," he said.
"First past the post is one of the biggest examples of a broken status quo in UK politics.
"A very modest part of any reset would be to accept and announce a National Commission for Electoral Reform."
The amendment's signatories include select committee chairs Ruth Cadbury, Cat Smith and Helen Hayes.
In 2022, Labour members at the party's annual conference voted in favour of a commitment to introduce proportional representation for general elections.
Q&A
What are the main criticisms of the UK's first-past-the-post voting system?
Critics argue that the first-past-the-post system allows candidates to win with a low share of the vote, which undermines democracy.
Why are Labour MPs calling for a review of the voting system now?
The recent emergence of multi-party politics has prompted Labour MPs to reconsider the effectiveness of the first-past-the-post system.
What is the proposed solution for the UK's voting system?
More than 60 Labour MPs are backing a national commission to examine the current voting system and recommend reforms.
How does the first-past-the-post system affect UK elections?
The first-past-the-post system is used for UK general elections and can lead to decisive results, but it may not accurately reflect the voters' preferences.
