Israel is no longer ‘shooting and crying’

For decades, Israeli propaganda has pushed the idea that Israelis view their killing, torture and displacement of Palestinians as tragic but necessary. This sentiment was exemplified in the famous quote attributed to Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meir: “We can forgive the Arabs for killing our sons. But we can never forgive them for forcing us to kill their sons.” Since then, one version or another of this way of thinking became such a dominant Israeli propaganda tool that a catchphrase emerged to describe it, “shooting and crying”.

Since the second Intifada, and especially after the barbaric siege of Gaza began in 2007, “shooting and crying” began to slowly fade from the mainstream of Israeli society. Israeli public discourse, which has always marginalised and erased the toll of their violence on the Palestinians, increasingly stopped emphasising the psychological toll of their violence on their soldiers. Instead, they were celebrating how their soldiers have become efficient killers and destroyers of Palestinians.

Anticipating how the siege would result in more killing of Palestinians, one of the chief academic supporters, if not the architect, of the siege on Gaza, demographer Arnon Soffer, approvingly proclaimed in 2004, “The pressure at the border will be awful. It’s going to be a terrible war. So, if we want to remain alive, we will have to kill and kill and kill. All day, every day.” Though Soffer noted at the time that “The only thing that concerns me is how to ensure that the boys and men who are going to have to do the killing will be able to return home to their families and be normal human beings”, the die had been cast. Israeli society was going to care less and less about the toll of the violence on themselves, and increasingly emphasise the killing of Palestinians. The killing and body counts would become so important for Israeli society that such news would come to be welcomed as joyful. Today, the pretence of crying while shooting has completely disappeared, replaced by the reality of Israelis being gleeful while shooting.

This gleeful violence is not the outcome of reasons that are peculiar to the Israeli nationality or identity itself, and certainly not to Jewish identity, culture, or religion, but is rather the predictable outcome of a state and a society deeply saturated with settler colonial violence and a racist worldview. Settler colonialism is a system and structure of violence that brings out the worst in people and drives them to become more extreme in their views and in their acts. Why?

For settler colonialism to work, two features have to become dominant in the settler state and society. The first is the utter dehumanisation of the Indigenous inhabitants of the land that the settler colonial project seeks to eliminate from existence physically, politically and culturally. This kind of dehumanisation removes all moral inhibitions from committing any and all kinds of violence against the colonised. At the same time, it provides the settler with a sense of absolute superiority to such an extent that it does the opposite of dehumanisation – it leads to the supra-humanisation of the settler. Much like the dehumanised Palestinian becomes a mere unwanted object like rubbish that can be disposed of without any moral inhibitions, the supra-humanised Israeli becomes almost like a divine being who is not subject to human-made laws, moral prohibitions, and even basic human decency.

The second related feature is that, with each act of settler colonial violence and its perceived success in securing more land for the settler without any serious negative consequences, the settler comes to associate violence with rewards. Violence is no longer seen as a necessary evil or a tragic necessity, but rather as a means of securing rewards, recognition, support, and positive reinforcement. This is what gives rise to glee while committing violence. When violence is committed, it is viewed as something that enhances and rewards the collective Israeli society, and therefore it engenders a gleeful reaction.

A society that celebrates so gleefully the use of some of the most atrocious forms of violence known to humanity does not possess the capacity to reform from within. It is a society that is incapable of healing itself and becoming a normal member of the region. The only solution is to take away the rewards of its violence. Today, Israel continues to reap the rewards of its settler colonial conquest of Palestine, as well as parts of Syria and Lebanon. These rewards come in the form of increased weapons sales, growing economic relations with powerful regions such as the European Union, and continued political support for Israel across mainstream Western political, social and cultural institutions.

This has to change. Far from being rewarded, Israel must be seriously punished for its settler colonial violence, and that means, at the bare minimum, the full and total economic isolation of the Israeli state. Only when Israelis are materially isolated from the world will they be forced onto a new path, where they come to accept the moral norm that genocidal violence should not be celebrated and welcomed with glee, but instead should be considered taboo. If the world does not act to force the Israeli state and society to meet this most basic of moral principles, then all the shame that rightfully falls on Israeli society should also befall the world’s nations that are enabling Israel’s gleeful violence.

The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera’s editorial stance.