Globalytic
GlobalyticPoliticsConflictsTechScienceHealthBusinessWorld

Globalytic

Independent world coverage — geopolitics, conflicts, science, and health — with AI-assisted editing and verification.

Sections

  • World
  • Politics
  • Conflicts
  • Tech
  • Science
  • Health
  • Business
  • World
  • All news
  • Search

Resources

  • About
  • RSS Feed
  • Search

Summaries and analysis may be AI-assisted. Content is for informational purposes only.

Not professional advice.

© 2026 Globalytic. All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. /News
  3. /Has Marles bowed to Trump’s wishes on defence spending? The figures are as clear as mud
Load next article
PoliticsAnalysisneutral

Has Marles bowed to Trump’s wishes on defence spending? The figures are as clear as mud

The Guardian WorldYesterday3 min readOriginal source →
Has Marles bowed to Trump’s wishes on defence spending? The figures are as clear as mud

TL;DR

Richard Marles faces pressure from Donald Trump to increase Australia's defense spending to 3.5% of GDP. Despite this, Marles and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese emphasize that spending decisions will be based on need rather than arbitrary targets.

Key points

  • Trump insists Australia must raise defense spending to 3.5% of GDP
  • Marles and Albanese emphasize need-based spending decisions
  • Meeting with Pete Hegseth highlighted pressure on allies
  • Australia aims to avoid arbitrary defense spending targets

Mentioned in this story

Richard MarlesDonald TrumpPete HegsethNATO

Why it matters

The outcome of defense spending decisions will impact Australia's military readiness and its relationship with the US.

If there’s anyone who knows just how much pressure Donald Trump is heaping on allies to lift defence spending, it’s Richard Marles.

The message was received loud and clear when he met his US counterpart, Pete Hegseth, in Singapore nearly a year ago.

Angry at Nato and other countries Trump views as leeching off the US for security, the zero sum president insisted Australia must lift spending to 3.5% of GDP.

Instead of admitting they would bring forward decisions and increase budgets, Marles and Anthony Albanese played down the demands from Washington. Spending decisions, they said, would not be based on arbitrary goals, but instead on the basis of need.

Sign up for the Breaking News Australia email

So it was surprising on Thursday when Marles suddenly used the release of Australia’s latest national defence strategy to measure total defence spending in Nato terms, pointing out that by 2033, Australia will be above the 3% of GDP threshold. Earlier, he had announced defence spending would rise to about 2.4% of GDP over the next decade.

In an address to the National Press Club, Marles said the government would spend $14bn more over the four-year forward estimates period, and $53bn more over the next decade.

By his count, that means that Labor has increased defence spending by about $117bn over 10 years, compared with the former Coalition government. About $5bn in so-called “reprioritisations” would free up cash. The cuts include scrapping 10 Spartan c-27J small transport planes.

Marles said that was how you compare “apples with apples”.

But, like so much in the defence portfolio, the figures are as clear as mud.

Nato rules account for major projects and procurement differently to Australia’s federal budget. As Australian Strategic Policy Institute researcher Linus Cohen has noted, while costs in Australia are spread out over the lifetime of a major asset, like a new warship, members of the 32-country bloc report spending when the ship is built and the bill is paid.

Some budget spending that sits outside the defence portfolio would also be included in the 3% total for Australia, including the costs of international intelligence activities and superannuation entitlements for service members.

On , Marles says the picture is clear.

Q&A

What defense spending increase did Trump demand from Australia?

Trump demanded that Australia increase its defense spending to 3.5% of GDP.

How did Richard Marles respond to Trump's defense spending demands?

Richard Marles downplayed Trump's demands, stating that spending decisions would be based on need rather than arbitrary goals.

What was the context of Marles' meeting with Pete Hegseth?

Marles met with US counterpart Pete Hegseth in Singapore nearly a year ago, where Trump’s pressure on allies regarding defense spending was emphasized.

What stance does Australia take on defense spending decisions?

Australia, represented by Marles and Albanese, insists that defense spending decisions will not be dictated by external pressures but will focus on national needs.

People also ask

  • Trump demands Australia defense spending increase
  • Richard Marles response to Trump defense spending
  • Australia defense spending policy explained
  • meeting between Marles and Pete Hegseth

Related Articles

Fans feel 'gouged' by £111 World Cup train tickets
World

Fans feel 'gouged' by £111 World Cup train tickets

Fans outraged as World Cup train tickets reach £111 for a 30-minute ride!

BBC News·8m ago·1 min read
Starmer was kept in dark about Mandelson’s vetting by two top civil servants
Politics

Starmer was kept in dark about Mandelson’s vetting by two top civil servants

Starmer kept in dark about Mandelson's security vetting failure by top officials.

The Guardian World·15m ago·1 min read
One of Arsenal's greatest unsung heroes - Keown's tribute to Manninger
World

One of Arsenal's greatest unsung heroes - Keown's tribute to Manninger

Martin Keown honors Alex Manninger, reflecting on their shared memories.

BBC News·19m ago·1 min read
India fails to pass bill to boost women’s representation after delimitation row
Politics

India fails to pass bill to boost women’s representation after delimitation row

India's government fails to pass women's representation bill amid delimitation controversy.

The Guardian World·27m ago·1 min read
Bournemouth close to appointing Rose
World

Bournemouth close to appointing Rose

Bournemouth is set to hire Marco Rose as their new head coach.

BBC News·43m ago·1 min read
Questions raised over whether £3.8m government grant awarded to Wrexham AFC was lawful
Politics

Questions raised over whether £3.8m government grant awarded to Wrexham AFC was lawful

Concerns raised about the legality of a £3.8m government grant to Wrexham AFC.

The Guardian World·55m ago·1 min read

More from News

View all →

See every story in News — including breaking news and analysis.

At a glance

  • Trump insists Australia must raise defense spending to 3.5% of GDP
  • Marles and Albanese emphasize need-based spending decisions
  • Meeting with Pete Hegseth highlighted pressure on allies
  • Australia aims to avoid arbitrary defense spending targets

Advertisement

Placeholder

the Aukus nuclear submarines agreement

Asked if the 2023 cost estimate of the controversial $368bn project is still current, he argued the best way to understand the total price tag is to consider it at about 0.15% of GDP over the life of the project. Initially unwilling to give a figure, Marles argues there hasn’t been a significant increase in the cost of nuclear subs.

But spending over the next decade on Aukus has increased from the $53bn-to-$63bn range provided in the last defence strategy two years ago, to between $71bn and $96bn over the same period today. The government says that change is related to the progress of related infrastructure, including the Osborne shipyard in South Australia and the Henderson base in Western Australia.

Under the Aukus deal, the first Virginia Class submarine from the United States is due to arrive in Australia in 2032, with another arriving every four years, before the bespoke Australian-built model starts coming online in 2042.

Perhaps frustrated at criticism from the opposition, the press gallery and defence commentators, Marles was pointed in his speech, insisting that increases in spending did not happen because of thinktanks, retired generals “or washed-up bureaucrats”.

On his own test – comparing apples with apples – Thursday’s explanation lacked the transparency Marles says Australian taxpayers expect and deserve.