Ed Miliband says he and Lammy feared Mandelson appointment could ‘blow up’

Ed Miliband and David Lammy discussed concerns about the appointment of Peter Mandelson as the UK’s ambassador to Washington which they feared could “blow up”, the energy secretary has revealed.

Miliband said he had spoken to Lammy, who was foreign secretary at the time Mandelson was given the Washington post, with both expressing reservations.

Mandelson was sacked after nine months in the job after new disclosures about his relationship with the late financier and child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

The Guardian revealed last week that Mandelson had failed his initial security vetting, which was then overruled by the Foreign Office, leading to the sacking of the FCDO’s permanent secretary, Oliver Robbins.

Robbins will give evidence to a select committee of MPs on Tuesday morning. He is expected to argue that he was following procedures by not disclosing details of the vetting process to ministers, and by ensuring Mandelson could be appointed, which was then the express desire of No 10.

Miliband told Sky News on Tuesday both he and Lammy were worried the appointment was risky and said Mandelson should never have been appointed, because of his links with Epstein and his lobbying firm’s business ties with Chinese and Russian companies.

“You’re saying he should never have been appointed and I agree with you,” Miliband told Sky News. “I steered well clear of Peter Mandelson when I became Labour leader in 2010.”

Asked what he thought about Mandelson’s initial appointment, he said: “That it could blow up, that it could go wrong … I had a conversation with David Lammy about it before the appointment, and I said I was worried about it … I think he was worried about it too.”

But Miliband said he was not asked directly what his views were of the appointment. “Maybe I wasn’t the person that people would necessarily ask. I think people knew my view on Peter Mandelson,” he added.

Miliband said he did not think it was a resigning matter for the prime minister. “No, I don’t think he should. Because I think if every time a prime minister made a mistake they resigned, we would shuttle through prime ministers like nobody’s business.

“Prime ministers make mistakes. I think on big judgments for this country, the biggest judgment of all, whether to join the war against Iran, Keir Starmer made a big and fundamental correct judgment.”