A federal appeals court has blocked the mailing of mifepristone, restricting access to abortion in the U.S. The ruling mandates that the abortion pill be distributed only in-person at clinics, potentially leading to an appeal to the Supreme Court.
Key points
Federal appeals court blocks mailing of mifepristone
Abortion pill must be distributed in-person at clinics
Ruling affects access to abortion across the U.S.
Potential appeal to the Supreme Court is likely
Decision follows the 2022 Supreme Court ruling on abortion
Mifepristone tablets sit on a table at a Planned Parenthood clinic in Ames, Iowa, July 18, 2024.
Mifepristone tablets sit on a table at a Planned Parenthood clinic in Ames, Iowa, on July 18, 2024.
Charlie Neibergall/AP
Charlie Neibergall/AP
A federal appeals court has restricted access to one of the most common means of abortion in the U.S. by blocking the mailing of mifepristone. A panel of the New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals is requiring that the abortion pill be distributed only in-person at clinics. Since the Supreme Court's 2022 ruling that overturned Roe v. Wade and allowed enforcement of abortion bans, prescriptions by mail has become a major way that abortions are provided — including to states where bans are in place. The decision sets up a likely appeal to the Supreme Court.
What is the impact of the federal appeals court ruling on mifepristone distribution?
The ruling restricts the distribution of mifepristone to in-person clinics, limiting access to abortion services across the U.S.
How does this ruling affect abortion access in states with bans?
The decision could significantly reduce abortion access in states with bans, as mail prescriptions have been a key method for obtaining the abortion pill.
Will the ruling on mifepristone be appealed to the Supreme Court?
Yes, the decision sets up a likely appeal to the Supreme Court, which may further address the legal status of abortion access.
What led to the federal appeals court's decision regarding mifepristone?
The ruling follows the Supreme Court's 2022 decision that overturned Roe v. Wade, allowing states to enforce stricter abortion laws.
Federal government accused of watering down proposal to protect Australia’s threatened species and ecosystems
Green groups accuse the Albanese government of diluting a proposal aimed at protecting Australia's threatened species and ecosystems. The latest draft standards for national environmental significance have faced criticism for lacking specific environmental objectives.
A federal appeals court has restricted access to one of the most common means of abortion in the U.S. by blocking mailing of prescriptions of mifepristone.
A panel of the New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals is requiring that the abortion pill be distributed only in person at clinics.
"Every abortion facilitated by FDA's action cancels Louisiana's ban on medical abortions and undermines its policy that 'every unborn child is human being from the moment of conception and is, therefore, a legal person,'" the ruling states.
Judges have long deferred to the Food and Drug Administration's judgments on the safety and appropriate regulation of drugs.
FDA officials under President Donald Trump have repeatedly stated the agency is conducting a new review of mifepristone's safety, at the direction of the president.
The judges noted in their ruling that FDA "could not say when that review might be complete and admitted it was still collecting data."
In a court filing, Louisiana's attorney general and a woman who says she was coerced into taking abortion pills requested that the FDA rules be rolled back to when the pills were allowed to be prescribed and dispensed only in person.
A Louisiana-based federal judge last month ruled that those allowances undermined the state's abortion ban but stopped short of undoing the regulations immediately.
Since the Supreme Court's 2022 ruling that overturned Roe v. Wade and allowed enforcement of abortion bans, prescriptions by mail have become a major way that abortions are provided — including to states where bans are in place.
"This is going to affect patients' access to abortion and miscarriage care in every state in the nation," said Julia Kaye, an ACLU lawyer. "When telemedicine is restricted, rural communities, people with low incomes, people with disabilities, survivors of intimate partner violence and communities of color suffer the most."
Mifepristone was approved in 2000 as a safe and effective way to end early pregnancies. It is typically used in combination with a second drug, misoprostol.
Because of rare cases of excessive bleeding, the FDA initially imposed strict limits on who could prescribe and distribute the pill — only specially certified physicians and only after an in-person appointment where the person would receive the pill.
Both those requirements were dropped during the COVID-19 years. At the time, FDA officials under President Joe Biden said that after more than 20 years of monitoring mifepristone use, and reviewing dozens of studies involving thousands of women, it was clear that women could safely use the pill without direct supervision.
Friday's ruling sets up a likely appeal to the Supreme Court.
The conservative-majority high court overturned abortion as a nationwide right in 2022 but unanimously preserved access to mifepristone two years later.
That 2024 decision sidestepped the core issues, however, by ruling that the anti-abortion doctors behind the case didn't have legal standing to sue.