Powerful states are trying to sabotage decarbonisation of shipping
Powerful states are hindering the decarbonisation of shipping despite existing solutions.
Al Jazeera English1 min read
Amy Winehouse's dad loses court case over auction
TL;DR
Mitch Winehouse lost a High Court case against two friends of Amy Winehouse over the auction of her belongings. The judge ruled that he could have discovered the items' sales with reasonable diligence.
Key points
- Mitch Winehouse lost a High Court battle.
- He sued two friends of Amy Winehouse over auctioned belongings.
- The judge ruled he could have discovered the sales with diligence.
Mentioned in this story
Mitch WinehouseAmy WinehouseNaomi ParryCatriona Gourlay
The father of the singer Amy Winehouse has lost a High Court battle against two of his daughter's friends after dozens of her belongings were auctioned.
Mitch Winehouse brought the case against Naomi Parry and Catriona Gourlay, accusing them of profiting from items sold at auctions in the United States.
Lawyers for Winehouse told the court the two women had "deliberately concealed" the sales and said he turned to legal action because it was his "only means of obtaining answers".
Deputy High Court judge Sarah Clarke KC ruled against this and said Winehouse "could have discovered what disputed items the defendants had with reasonable diligence".
The judge said Winehouse was "understandably sensitive about anyone who he perceives as exploiting Amy's memory... but also, in my judgement, he is equally sensitive about ensuring that the family continue to benefit financially."
She also said that he "likes to dominate people and situations", that she found him to be an "unreliable witness" and that he brought the claim "without bothering to check until shortly before trial" that he had a valid claim for the items he was claiming for.
Amy Winehouse was a Grammy-winning singer-songwriter, best known for hits including Rehab and Back to Black, who died in 2011 at the age of 27.
Barristers for the Parry and Gourlay said the items had either been given to them by Amy Winehouse or already belonged to them.
The judge described how the singer would "routinely" give clothing to her close friends as she did not want to be seen wearing the same piece more than once in public and she had "more items than she could ever wear, use or store".
She also mentioned her "extraordinary generosity" and found that it was consistent with her character to give items away and not change her mind about it.
Parry said in a statement read out in court: "I stood beside Amy as a friend, a creative partner, and her costume designer. What we shared was built on trust, loyalty, and a genuine love of the work.
"For now, my focus is on rebuilding my life and career, and protecting my name, the work I created with Amy, and her legacy."
Listen to the best of BBC Radio London on Sounds and follow BBC London on Facebook, X and Instagram
Q&A
What was the outcome of Mitch Winehouse's court case?
Mitch Winehouse lost his High Court case against Naomi Parry and Catriona Gourlay regarding the auction of Amy Winehouse's belongings.
Why did Mitch Winehouse sue Amy Winehouse's friends?
He accused them of profiting from the sale of his daughter's items and claimed they concealed the auction sales.
What did the judge say about Mitch Winehouse's claims?
The judge ruled that he could have reasonably discovered the disputed items' sales and noted his sensitivity to financial benefits from Amy's memory.
